Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Jekill and Hyde

Andrews 67h cams and Fat Cat baffles

  #1  
Old 08-07-2009, 09:44 AM
roadroids's Avatar
roadroids
roadroids is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Andrews 67h cams and Fat Cat baffles

Been looking around at cams to increase torque across the board and be less noisy. I found the Andrews 67h on their site. The lift would work with my springs and build and would not require going to roller rockers. I cannot find any posts or anything on the internet about this cam. Anyone know anything about this cam? Also, should I be using the Fat Cat big bore baffles?

I have a 107 with Hillside stage 3 heads and a welded crank with timkins on the bottom. I am currently running a wood 6-6 with 10.35 compression. I am a pretty aggressive rider.

67H duration: 252 287 lift: .570
Hi-lift Performance cams for 95-107+ inches, 10.0 to10.8 C.R. with high flow head setup. (2600-6400+ RPM).
 
  #2  
Old 08-07-2009, 10:41 AM
beaureed445's Avatar
beaureed445
beaureed445 is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Edmond, Ok
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I'll say it first- Talk to Scott about cams. He did your heads, and I'd guess he's familiar with your build. What baffle are you running in the Fat Cat right now? What kind of power are you getting from your current set-up?
 
  #3  
Old 08-07-2009, 01:12 PM
roadroids's Avatar
roadroids
roadroids is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I really want to hear from anyone who has experience with the Andrews 67h. I checked out HQ and Zippers cams and now am curious about this Andrews cam - there is zip that I can find about it. I currently run Wood 6-6's and do not feel they are a good match for my 107.
I believe I am running the regular quiet baffles.
 
  #4  
Old 08-07-2009, 01:40 PM
skyhook's Avatar
skyhook
skyhook is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have screamin' eagle 257 cams in a 110" dyna...these cams are almost identical to the andrews 67...these are big cams and would give you better peak numbers on the dyno...but they would not give more torque through the rpm range...you would probably have less torque below about 3200 rpm...i also have a good bit of valvetrain noise, so i don't think the andrews 67 will be quieter than the wood 6
 
  #5  
Old 08-07-2009, 02:44 PM
roadroids's Avatar
roadroids
roadroids is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Skyhook that's what I wanted to know!
 
  #6  
Old 08-07-2009, 05:40 PM
roadglide65's Avatar
roadglide65
roadglide65 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roadroids
Been looking around at cams to increase torque across the board and be less noisy. I found the Andrews 67h on their site. The lift would work with my springs and build and would not require going to roller rockers. I cannot find any posts or anything on the internet about this cam. Anyone know anything about this cam? Also, should I be using the Fat Cat big bore baffles?

I have a 107 with Hillside stage 3 heads and a welded crank with timkins on the bottom. I am currently running a wood 6-6 with 10.35 compression. I am a pretty aggressive rider.

67H duration: 252 287 lift: .570
Hi-lift Performance cams for 95-107+ inches, 10.0 to10.8 C.R. with high flow head setup. (2600-6400+ RPM).

I have the 67gs in my 110 kit and they work fine for me. What you don't like about the 6-6 ? The 67s are more of a mid range cam. As far as the big bore baffle don't think you need it. I run a modified Fat Cat with a Supper Trap muffler FWIW.

And the duration on those cam's are 252/260 Not 252/287
 
  #7  
Old 01-24-2010, 10:31 AM
Rebel78's Avatar
Rebel78
Rebel78 is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dubai
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roadglide65
I have the 67gs in my 110 kit and they work fine for me. What you don't like about the 6-6 ? The 67s are more of a mid range cam. As far as the big bore baffle don't think you need it. I run a modified Fat Cat with a Supper Trap muffler FWIW.

And the duration on those cam's are 252/260 Not 252/287
Do you have any numbers for your build?
 
  #8  
Old 01-24-2010, 02:42 PM
roadglide65's Avatar
roadglide65
roadglide65 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rebel78
Do you have any numbers for your build?
Here you go.

http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i1...ynojul2009.jpg
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
o0Requiem0o
Touring Models
5
04-01-2014 07:24 AM
Sallyman
Touring Models
1
05-21-2010 12:09 AM
swampking
Exhaust System Topics
10
08-09-2009 05:48 PM
jnickel
Exhaust System Topics
8
10-17-2007 03:11 PM
whateva
Touring Models
7
02-21-2007 12:16 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Andrews 67h cams and Fat Cat baffles



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.