Blowers/Turbos/Nitrous Oxide For you Gear Heads. Here is the place to discuss your souped-up, sophisticated, out of control and money pit monsters.

Procharger vrs Trask

  #1  
Old 02-18-2016, 08:01 AM
Proaction14's Avatar
Proaction14
Proaction14 is offline
Road Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Damascus MD
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Procharger vrs Trask

Kind of bummed this forum isn't more active. A little background first. I've always been a gear head and into hot rods and bikes. I've been drag racing cars for 30 years, I started with N/A motors, then nitrous, and then twin turbo motors for the last 12 years or so, I've had motors with a LOT of HP, speed and power are all relative and have to be respected especially on the street. I'm very capable of turning wrenches, TIG welding, computer savvy and EFI savvy, assembling engines, fabricating and all the other goodies that go along with building and racing cars, but, I know when to shut my yap and let a specialist do his thing. I don't want a super high HP/TQ motor, but something I can ride and enjoy that has some *** when I occasionally want to roll the throttle a little.


I'm really leaning towards a Procharger but after doing Google searches I've seen some belt issues, and some other random mechanical failure issues. The Trask set up seems very easy on the motor in general with low maintenance, very reliable. However I am kind of steering away from the turbo because I've been drag racing with them for so long I want to try something new. I have to be honest, I don't like the overall look of the turbo set up, it's just not as clean as the Procharger, I also am not a fan of "any" lag especially on a bike, and, I sit in a lot of traffic so any added heat is not an option as I get older I want to be comfortable and I know turbos, and heat are just the nature of the beast.


I have seen some shops like Drago's seem like they really know their **** and I will eventually reach out to them, but I wanted to get some feedback from some of you guys that have owned and actually driven one or the other. I am not looking at any other options like the rear mounted turbo or any of the other blower options. The Thomson roots blower is cool, but just too bulky. Just please don't be biased based on what is on your bike, but what your experience has been like with the product and reliability, heat with the turbo, maintenance with the belts Prochargers have, etc. Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 02-20-2016, 06:08 PM
Jondalar's Avatar
Jondalar
Jondalar is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I'm fine with the Trask. And this site should be more active. The good thing about a supercharger, Turbo, or nitrous kit is that it's a big bang for the money.
 
  #3  
Old 02-20-2016, 11:40 PM
TurboChris's Avatar
TurboChris
TurboChris is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 113
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I MUCH prefer the "look" of a turbo over a blower on a touring bike....and came this close to pulling the trigger on a trask set up at the end of last year...but the total came out to be just a couple thousand more than I could justify with work being slow. So I went with a Dragos 2.5 98" build and full suspension and blacking out on my 06 Road Glide instead. As far as the heat issue....I've seen LOTS of comments about how the heat "must" be uncomfortable.....but I've NEVER seen a comment about how it "is" uncomfortable. Hell, they're located in PHOENIX....I've seen LOTS of comments from trask owners about how much they LOVE their setup...not one about major issues or problems.
 

Last edited by TurboChris; 11-12-2016 at 02:49 PM.
  #4  
Old 05-06-2016, 07:46 PM
ramx50's Avatar
ramx50
ramx50 is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 155
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I looked at both options and I ended up going with a pro charger and I love it. Smooth throttle and lots of power.. I had my build done by DAS Performance in Dracut ma who did top quality work. If you google procharger Harley my bike is the black SG on the dyno in the DAS dyno room. all I can say is get it, you will love it
 
  #5  
Old 06-13-2016, 03:37 AM
E.Falla's Avatar
E.Falla
E.Falla is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Home off the Vikings
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hawe used the basic trask kit on my 07 StreetGlide for two years now. First year with the stock engine. Today i running a 117". Turbo lag is not a big issue with the Trask kit, the turbo is pretty smaal and builds boost wery fast. I feel that the hole kit is high quality, yes it is pretty expensive, but try to build a NA engine with 300 NM and se what that cost I am super happy with the Trask. Use the bike almost every day, and a big bonus is the coolest turbo sound. (sorry for my bad English)
 
  #6  
Old 06-14-2016, 03:43 AM
FRANK DRAGO's Avatar
FRANK DRAGO
FRANK DRAGO is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Machesney park
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Both systems are great you won't go wrong with either kit.
 
  #7  
Old 07-29-2016, 07:08 AM
lyork's Avatar
lyork
lyork is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 2,108
Received 450 Likes on 318 Posts
Default

The ProCharger is a great looking system on the bike.
 
  #8  
Old 07-29-2016, 05:54 PM
Unbalanced's Avatar
Unbalanced
Unbalanced is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Daytona Beach Area
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The only qualm I have is that by the time you add everything on the procharger/trask you end up more expensive than say the Aero. I'd suggest giving Frank that call and go through the pricing and see if you come up with the same costing I did when I was looking into it. The other strong selling point to me on the Aero Charger was the ability to get instant on. the newest one is even more intriguing, but living in FL I do worry about the heat.
 

Last edited by Unbalanced; 07-29-2016 at 05:57 PM.
  #9  
Old 08-02-2016, 10:49 AM
hrdtail78's Avatar
hrdtail78
hrdtail78 is offline
Road Warrior

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alorton, Illinois
Posts: 1,897
Received 565 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

My experience is with the pro charger.


There are better sprag clutch's offered by aftermarket and I even believe they can be sourced through pro charger. The whole 6 ribbed belts are an option also. BUT their belt life is their life.


Good news if the belt does brake, and the bike is tuned correctly. It can still be ridden and wont leave you stranded.
 
  #10  
Old 08-02-2016, 01:30 PM
Deadstroke's Avatar
Deadstroke
Deadstroke is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 258
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unbalanced
The only qualm I have is that by the time you add everything on the procharger/trask you end up more expensive than say the Aero. I'd suggest giving Frank that call and go through the pricing and see if you come up with the same costing I did when I was looking into it. The other strong selling point to me on the Aero Charger was the ability to get instant on. the newest one is even more intriguing, but living in FL I do worry about the heat.
All the prices are close, Aerocharger wont burn up in a few years like trask seems too.. at the end of the day they are all about the same cost.. I am a aerocharger guy myself and wouldnt trade it..

Almost forgot, Aerocharger heat is less than trask and self contained oiling, Low maintenance, low heat great performance with variable vane..
 

Last edited by Deadstroke; 08-02-2016 at 01:34 PM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Procharger vrs Trask



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.