don't see the fascination with the Low Rider S
#32
with the subject of every other thread on here about how great this bike is, I don't get it , I like the standard low rier much better, and even better than other dynas because it had the most chrome,
the S reminds me of this... it's looks like the whole thing is made of black plastic.
#33
with the subject of every other thread on here about how great this bike is, I don't get it , I like the standard low rier much better, and even better than other dynas because it had the most chrome,
the S reminds me of this... it's looks like the whole thing is made of black plastic.
The following users liked this post:
cvaria (06-30-2016)
#34
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 12,344
Received 2,189 Likes
on
1,677 Posts
#36
The following users liked this post:
hd4evr2008 (07-02-2016)
#37
There are people out there that just don't like a lot of chrome and shiny **** on their bikes or cars and it has nothing to do with some TV show. I've never been a fan of chrome, 10 years ago or now. Everyone has their own personal taste. That being said, while I do like the LRS and some of the options it features, I wouldn't trade my '14 SB for it.
#39
If you don't like it; don't buy it! No one is putting a gun to your head. I think harley finally figured out people like choices. If you want lots of chrome to polish in your driveway, get the standard low rider. If you like riding and want a bike with a big motor buy an S model. black parts are easly cleaned with a garden hose leaving more time to ride and less time on your knees. What's not to get?