Cams Dyno tune fxdb Done!
#1
#4
Not bad, but your not getting the most out of the cams if you suspected they were too big. Don't know the specs, so I can't say for sure, but guys are getting mid 90's HP and 100+ tq with the Andrews 48. That can pulls from the get go. If you plan on doing a big bore and head work down the road, then the redshifts are fine.
#6
Yeah my buddy is running the 777's in a 103. Loves them. His bike hangs with mine for about 5 seconds, than I'm walking him.
What fuel moto cams are you running?
What fuel moto cams are you running?
Last edited by Rmuller; 03-11-2012 at 08:24 PM.
#7
Not bad, but your not getting the most out of the cams if you suspected they were too big. Don't know the specs, so I can't say for sure, but guys are getting mid 90's HP and 100+ tq with the Andrews 48. That can pulls from the get go. If you plan on doing a big bore and head work down the road, then the redshifts are fine.
103 or bigger is next. Need to save money for heads first.
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Mike650:
That 107 kit is juicy that is for sure and would be $1,300 well spent! I promised I wouldn't do any engine mod's till I had 40,000+ km's on my engine, only 13,000 now so I've got a way to go, maybe a winter project two or three years from now.
#10
Not really super impressive numbers for a 107". You'd be better off having one of the engine guys that sponsor here do it. You'd get more hands on and you know it would be built for you. I've seen almost those numbers out of 98" build from them. Not quite that torque but not far from it either. 107" builds are pushing in the 115+ hp and a little more torque. Not as crazy of cams either, so its very streetable.