Dyno ChartsThis forum is for posting of your Dyno Charts. You will use a prefix to designate your Cubic Inches. When posting please include all model year, Cubic Inch and modifications in the thread title and in the body when posting your Dyno Charts.
Dragula sounded very good, Fat Cat has a different tone for sure, and louder. Both appealing to my ears.
Thanks! My Pro Pipe is as loud as I would ever go, and there have been quite a few members who think the Fat Cat is a little louder, so that's off the list.
I've heard good things about the Dragula performance, and if it's a tad less loud than the Fat Cat, that's good.
Thanks! My Pro Pipe is as loud as I would ever go, and there have been quite a few members who think the Fat Cat is a little louder, so that's off the list.
I've heard good things about the Dragula performance, and if it's a tad less loud than the Fat Cat, that's good.
I think the Dragula is quieter than the FatCat by a tad. I will say the tone changed going from a 107" to the 124", I like it better now.
Chad tuned bikes with both with the same engine so he could probably tell you for sure
Sometimes it's a little hard to match tones of 2 different pipes on 2 different motors. The compression ratio will make a huge difference in decibel and tone.... My 80" EVo at 10:1 was modest at 11.1:1 IT WAS LOUD.....
That is true, I had 3 different pipes on the same build tuned by a well respected tuner a year apart. It was enlightening to see the subtle diffs between the 2/1s and the not so subtle diff between them and the staggered duals.