113"
#11
First, not the point; the post title is 113" but the motor is a 120"
Second, the 125/130 numbers are from a "preliminary" tune. The motor has not been tuned which indicates that the OP expects higher number when he returns for the "final" tune and for a 113", I don't think the 125/130 will improve that much. However, we now know thanks to gtrracer's catch that the motor is a 120" which does explain the higher numbers for a preliminary tune and those numbers will likely improve with the final tune.
Third, I am not a resident guru. Scott and Kirby have earned that status; I am but a lowly DIY shade tree grease monkey.
Second, the 125/130 numbers are from a "preliminary" tune. The motor has not been tuned which indicates that the OP expects higher number when he returns for the "final" tune and for a 113", I don't think the 125/130 will improve that much. However, we now know thanks to gtrracer's catch that the motor is a 120" which does explain the higher numbers for a preliminary tune and those numbers will likely improve with the final tune.
Third, I am not a resident guru. Scott and Kirby have earned that status; I am but a lowly DIY shade tree grease monkey.
#12
We've seen 113"s at the 130/130 mark with a Wood 8.
There is a fellow on the CVO site that has one of our set ups.
He also runs a 30T trans sprocket on that.
RC Cycles certainly knows what they are doing.
Bob Lobenburg is one of the best tuners in the country, if I was asked that question.
We always reccomend them to our clients if they are even remotely close to them.
Scott
There is a fellow on the CVO site that has one of our set ups.
He also runs a 30T trans sprocket on that.
RC Cycles certainly knows what they are doing.
Bob Lobenburg is one of the best tuners in the country, if I was asked that question.
We always reccomend them to our clients if they are even remotely close to them.
Scott
Thanks scott!
#13
First, not the point; the post title is 113" but the motor is a 120"
Second, the 125/130 numbers are from a "preliminary" tune. The motor has not been tuned which indicates that the OP expects higher number when he returns for the "final" tune and for a 113", I don't think the 125/130 will improve that much. However, we now know thanks to gtrracer's catch that the motor is a 120" which does explain the higher numbers for a preliminary tune and those numbers will likely improve with the final tune.
Third, I am not a resident guru. Scott and Kirby have earned that status; I am but a lowly DIY shade tree grease monkey.
Second, the 125/130 numbers are from a "preliminary" tune. The motor has not been tuned which indicates that the OP expects higher number when he returns for the "final" tune and for a 113", I don't think the 125/130 will improve that much. However, we now know thanks to gtrracer's catch that the motor is a 120" which does explain the higher numbers for a preliminary tune and those numbers will likely improve with the final tune.
Third, I am not a resident guru. Scott and Kirby have earned that status; I am but a lowly DIY shade tree grease monkey.
#14
Hi djl, I honestly hope you don't think I was mocking you. I respect the knowledge that you share with everyone here in HD Forums and I truly believe you are in a catagory above average when it comes to HD's. A few times you have acknowledged my efforts to help and that was quite gratifying Thank you...Sorry if I offended you. Bob...
#15
#17
Okay Bob says the tune is done, other schools of thought say the motor will make a little more once it is broken in. I am happy with the power, the numbers, the sound, but most of all the rideability. I might go back at 2500 miles when I start to run the synthetic with a fresh set of plugs and have Bob squeeze a couple more ponies.
#18
Ron says the 662-1's will make more but in turn reduce the reliability......I average 10k and year, hence I'll take Ron's wisdom and ride with it.
Just rambling........................
#19
Okay Bob says the tune is done, other schools of thought say the motor will make a little more once it is broken in. I am happy with the power, the numbers, the sound, but most of all the rideability. I might go back at 2500 miles when I start to run the synthetic with a fresh set of plugs and have Bob squeeze a couple more ponies.
Nice numbers though. enjoy...
#20
My wife has been riding on my right wing for years and tolerates the sound level with this set up. I am sure a 2-1 would flatten the bottom with a price to pay in noise, cost for a ghost pipe (stretched bags) and making the ride look better on paper just isn't worth it today but there is always tomorrow :-)