Its a horrible choice...

 

S&S Recommended their new HP-103 for my application today.
How does this look?

S&S HP103 20° 49° 45° 26° 249° 251° .575" .575" 102.7° 101.5° .199" .206"

 

Intake close is way too late. Drop in a set of Andrews 48s and be done with it.

 

yep andrews 48 around 250 to your door

 

Guys I DO NOT ride a Bagger!

Was not looking for a touring cam that has super roll on torque.

I`ve bought a cam for Max WOT, stop light to stop light drag racing...

 

Exactly - that's any they are recommending a torquer cam. The high rpm cams only work well in sustained racing. On the street, the engine that kicks in hard with torque right from the stoplight wins.

This is why the guys are steering you in that direction versus the high rpm cams.

Jim G

 

Bagger, softail or dyna; the cams you are looking are not good choices and will present rideability issues unless you think you can run between 3500 and 5500 rpms all the time. I won't argue with you or try to convince you; install the 260 or HP-103 and let us know how it works out for ya. Just remember that torque is what wins those light to light races! The guy with the torque cam will be away from the light while you are either stalled at the light or spinning the rear tire trying to get away from the light.

 

Run the HP 103, dude you da man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Personally I wouldn't listen to these jackasses and I'd put the 260 in, but you probably don't have the hair to do it.

 

go for it try it and let us know if u like it .....lolllll

 

Big cam Big power!!! Not!!!! Andrews 48 and cut the ****.. Maybe u will not have to ride ur bike till its going to explode if u actually had a bike that made any power.. Andrews 48 is best choice and yes it will pull to redline.. What u think is going to happen with the 48 u hit 3500 rpms and the bike turns into a pumpkin ??? I mean come on the andrews 48 is going to run till u hit the redline