Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Jekill and Hyde

maximizing low-mid torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 10-30-2014, 09:53 PM
Rampant's Avatar
Rampant
Rampant is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DK Custom
The single best value for an increase in low & mid range torque is a set of Thunder Torque Inserts. For around $25, they increase torque an average of 5-10% across the entire low & mid range band. They can be used on almost any exhaust system.

Check out some of the dyno charts at the link above.
basically between me and the bike, sometimes it feels weak at slow (like walking ish) speeds around town, almost like the bike would stall if I wasn't careful with the clutch. I'd like the motor to have enough strength to push me+bike around easily at low rpm when doing tight city maneuvers.
 
  #12  
Old 10-30-2014, 10:13 PM
Rampant's Avatar
Rampant
Rampant is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is the correct size torque insert for a stock exhaust on a 2009 FLHP? Also, do you have an exhaust you recommend to maximize <3000rpm torque?
 
  #13  
Old 10-30-2014, 10:31 PM
HD Pilot's Avatar
HD Pilot
HD Pilot is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: N Texas
Posts: 3,791
Received 55 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Andrews 48 cams, D&D exhaust, get a appropriate map for your PV and a few ATs, should be happy.
 
  #14  
Old 10-30-2014, 10:53 PM
Rampant's Avatar
Rampant
Rampant is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

trying to avoid cams because I do not have any place that I could do the install myself - all we have here is street parking so I'd be bolting things on as cars drive by. Not a good place to pop open the engine or do multi-hour installs. Not to mention no place to put tools. So I'd have to take it to the shop and pay hundreds for labor. :/

All I really need is enough umph to make low-low rpm torque good enough that the engine doesn't struggle under all the load. If I can. If not....
 
  #15  
Old 10-31-2014, 06:47 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,435
Received 2,852 Likes on 2,419 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Rampant
I'm getting opposite advice here... Dyno graphs?
No you're not! The factory exhaust on recent bikes is a 2-into-1, except it then splits into two. The critical feature of that design is bringing the two pipes together, which enables the two cylinders to work together off each other. A 2-into-1 like the one in my photo below works better than the older split system.

Dyno graphs will only help if they are taken on the same bike and same dyno, so don't lean too heavily on that. There are very few examples of doing that.

If you have the stock catalytic converter you can replace it with a clear collector and retain the rest of your pipes, then add aftermarket mufflers. After that take it to a local indy for new cams, because they are going to do even more for you.

Our stock bikes come with restrictive airbox and mufflers plus quiet cams, which are compromised to comply with EPA regulations. IMHO changing the cams is the most important upgrade. Call a local indy for prices before you decide against doing that! You may just be surprised at the cost and improved performance.
 
  #16  
Old 10-31-2014, 08:45 AM
Rampant's Avatar
Rampant
Rampant is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by grbrown
No you're not! The factory exhaust on recent bikes is a 2-into-1, except it then splits into two. The critical feature of that design is bringing the two pipes together, which enables the two cylinders to work together off each other. A 2-into-1 like the one in my photo below works better than the older split system.

Dyno graphs will only help if they are taken on the same bike and same dyno, so don't lean too heavily on that. There are very few examples of doing that.

If you have the stock catalytic converter you can replace it with a clear collector and retain the rest of your pipes, then add aftermarket mufflers. After that take it to a local indy for new cams, because they are going to do even more for you.

Our stock bikes come with restrictive airbox and mufflers plus quiet cams, which are compromised to comply with EPA regulations. IMHO changing the cams is the most important upgrade. Call a local indy for prices before you decide against doing that! You may just be surprised at the cost and improved performance.
I already talked to an indy. Cost including parts is like 800-900 bucks. Cams, adjustable pushrods, labor, etc.

plus of course stage 1 upgrades - Airbox, pipes, PCV (another coouple hundred). so over a grand even if I do the stage 1 myself.

I'm not trying to max out performance, just make it happier around town. If I had my own place to do work cams would be a no brainer
 
  #17  
Old 11-02-2014, 01:27 PM
ntraindavefl's Avatar
ntraindavefl
ntraindavefl is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: May 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 1,845
Received 333 Likes on 234 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rampant
I was looking at the patriot 2-1, but their dyno graph shows terrible low end torque


If the exhaust is shorter ie. patriot pipe, the low end power will suffer. The longer 2 into 1's usually have equal length headers a longer collector and longer muffler body, all this helps low end. Short pipes cause more reversion of exhaust gases that disturb the next combustion cycle.
 
  #18  
Old 11-03-2014, 08:06 PM
Rampant's Avatar
Rampant
Rampant is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah. I've decided on some slip ons. Should help nnow I just need to know about the inserts
 
  #19  
Old 11-03-2014, 09:32 PM
Boost's Avatar
Boost
Boost is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 302
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rampant
Yeah. I've decided on some slip ons. Should help nnow I just need to know about the inserts

Not trying to stir the pot here but I don't quit get the logic. You plan on putting on better flowing slip-ons and then install restrictive torque cones..

Torque Cone benefits are debatable. Some claim that the do work, some claim they don't. Of course, all the distributers claim they work (no surprise there).

Would be nice to see some independent before and after dyno results.
dyno 1. Slip-ons without the cone
dybo 2. Slip-ons with cone
No tuning prior to each pull
 

Last edited by Boost; 11-04-2014 at 03:56 AM.
  #20  
Old 11-04-2014, 09:41 PM
DK Custom's Avatar
DK Custom
DK Custom is online now
Platinum Sponsor
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Red Banks, Mississippi
Posts: 17,464
Received 3,940 Likes on 2,295 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rampant
What is the correct size torque insert for a stock exhaust on a 2009 FLHP? Also, do you have an exhaust you recommend to maximize <3000rpm torque?
Sorry, just saw this question...if you have not had it answered already via emailing or calling us.... Based on the opening at the tail end of your exhaust-

For 1.5" - 2.5" the W118 Model will work well.

Fore 2.5"-3.5" the W258 will work well.

For 3.5" or larger ends the W258 Model is generally preferred.



Originally Posted by Boost
Not trying to stir the pot here but I don't quit get the logic. You plan on putting on better flowing slip-ons and then install restrictive torque cones..

Torque Cone benefits are debatable. Some claim that the do work, some claim they don't. Of course, all the distributers claim they work (no surprise there).

Would be nice to see some independent before and after dyno results.
dyno 1. Slip-ons without the cone
dybo 2. Slip-ons with cone
No tuning prior to each pull
It is a common misunderstanding. Thunder Torque Inserts are NOT Torque Cones.

They don't look the same.

They don't install in the same location.

They don't work on restriction or back-pressure.

Thunder Torque Inserts are a patent pending design, virtually the opposite of Torque Cones. The TTI's work by Speeding up exhaust gas velocity, NOT restricting it.

We have done many dyno runs before/after with torque cones. We have found the same thing that most others have found...no improvement, and sometimes a detriment.

Thunder Torque Inserts have shown themselves to work well, time after time on the dyno, as well as the butt dyno. The link above has more than a few dyno charts in them, but I will put a typical one below-

 
__________________
Kevin

DKCustomProducts.com
Call/Text: 662-252-8828
Email: Support@DKCustomProducts.com









Quick Reply: maximizing low-mid torque



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.