Twin cooled Heritage Classic ?
09-11-2015, 08:25 AM
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Twin cooled Heritage Classic ?
Page 42 in the latest HOG publication they have 2016 Heritage shown with a 103 Twin cooled HO 103. Where did they put the radiator?
Jonnierock
09-11-2015, 08:30 AM
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 309
I saw that too. I think it might be a mis-print?
09-11-2015, 08:58 AM
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,442
Yeah, I'd vote for bad info...I don't think the twin-cooled mills have trickled out that far yet...
09-11-2015, 09:27 AM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northeast
Posts: 699
The 2016 Heritage is NOT twin cooled. That is a publication error in HOG magazine. Hello...where were the proofreaders??
09-11-2015, 09:42 AM
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HazyHog
Hello...where were the proofreaders??
They were out riding their new twin-cooled 2016 Heritages...
09-11-2015, 12:59 PM
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rolla, Missouri
Posts: 4,358
Yep that "twin cooled" engine is mentioned, but I don't believe they really meant to put it that way.
The new Rushmore 103 High Output engine is what they meant to say, and they inadvertently kept the twin cooled part.
As most know, without lowers to hold the radiators your not going to get the twin cooled engine.
09-11-2015, 01:45 PM
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Coastal Carolina
Posts: 3,832
Saw it too. It's amazing how many of us noticed it and their editors didn't.
09-11-2015, 01:51 PM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northeast
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by
UUNetBill
They were out riding their new twin-cooled 2016 Heritages...
funny
Apparently cut and paste while writing an article is a dangerous thing.
09-11-2015, 03:24 PM
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 5,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HazyHog
The 2016 Heritage is NOT twin cooled. That is a publication error in HOG magazine. Hello...where were the proofreaders??
Proofeaders are typically more about the grammar and structure, not the content. They'd have to be a knowledgeable as the writer to do that.
09-11-2015, 04:16 PM
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Midlands of SC
Posts: 2,060
+1 on that. My neice was a proof reader for a jet engine company for their technical manuals and she was no where near a jet mechanic.