General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

96 vs. 103 engines??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-12-2012, 05:30 PM
LDB415's Avatar
LDB415
LDB415 is offline
Road Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 96 vs. 103 engines??

It occurred to me the question of a 96 vs a 103 could apply outside the realm of Softails so I'm asking here where more may see and reply. I'm looking at a 2011 FLSTC at the dealer with 15,225 miles on it. It has V&H BSL pipes, stage 1 intake, some kind of tuner plus several smaller extras like a windshield bag, small luggage rack, ISO-grips and a few covers etc. on it. They are asking $17,100 for it plus TTL etc.. The bike was bought new from them and all work and add ons were done in their shop.

My riding style is casual for want of a better term. My hero is the tortoise not the hare. I doubt I would ride over the speed limit more than 0.00173% of the time. Most of the time I'd likely be a few mph below the speed limit. I want to see the ride. That's a big part of it to me. That's much better and easier done riding casually.

So, that said, you guys with lots more FLSTC experience than I, how does that bike sound and what would be a reasonable offer on it? How does the 96 compare to the 103? With those pipes and intake and tuner am I likely to get better or worse than stock fuel mpg or be basically the same? What else should I know about or look into or be wary of? Thanks for any and all input on this.
 
  #2  
Old 08-12-2012, 05:53 PM
Dilemma's Avatar
Dilemma
Dilemma is offline
Road Master
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Suburban Hell, MN
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They are asking $17,100
In my humble opinion, that's a bit much for an '11 with 15,225 miles. You can find a TON of examples for that kind of coin with WAY less miles.

As for the 103 vs 96? Very little difference from my limited comparisons.
 
  #3  
Old 08-12-2012, 06:56 PM
Romark's Avatar
Romark
Romark is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lake Jackson, TX
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My opinion is if both the 96 and 103 are stock compression & stock cams, for my riding style, which sounds like the way you ride as well, I dont think you will notice the difference.

Before this week my bike was a stock 96" with Reinhart 2-2 pipes with an S&S air cleaner and the dealer download. It ran well and got 50 mpg on the highway.

Just this week I had 103" cylinders, high compression pistons, SE 255 cams and a tuner all installed. There is a pronounced difference over what I had. Still breaking it in so I am trying to baby it but I can already tell the engine is much stronger.

I predict the mileage I am getting from my back tire will be cut in half.
 
  #4  
Old 08-12-2012, 07:06 PM
2kids3pets's Avatar
2kids3pets
2kids3pets is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: River City Western Canada
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LDB415
It occurred to me the question of a 96 vs a 103 could apply outside the realm of Softails so I'm asking here where more may see and reply. I'm looking at a 2011 FLSTC at the dealer with 15,225 miles on it. It has V&H BSL pipes, stage 1 intake, some kind of tuner plus several smaller extras like a windshield bag, small luggage rack, ISO-grips and a few covers etc. on it. They are asking $17,100 for it plus TTL etc.. The bike was bought new from them and all work and add ons were done in their shop.

My riding style is casual for want of a better term. My hero is the tortoise not the hare. I doubt I would ride over the speed limit more than 0.00173% of the time. Most of the time I'd likely be a few mph below the speed limit. I want to see the ride. That's a big part of it to me. That's much better and easier done riding casually.


So, that said, you guys with lots more FLSTC experience than I, how does that bike sound and what would be a reasonable offer on it? How does the 96 compare to the 103? With those pipes and intake and tuner am I likely to get better or worse than stock fuel mpg or be basically the same? What else should I know about or look into or be wary of? Thanks for any and all input on this.

I ride much the same way and the 96 on my RKC is plenty and then some...I run out of ***** long before I run out of throttle
 
  #5  
Old 08-12-2012, 07:11 PM
mmcbeat's Avatar
mmcbeat
mmcbeat is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,230
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

JMO - but the only difference I see (feel) in the 96 vs the 103 (I have owned both) is that 6th gear seems a little more "usable" with the 103. Seat of the pants only - no hard facts.
 
  #6  
Old 08-12-2012, 08:24 PM
Then Came Bronson's Avatar
Then Came Bronson
Then Came Bronson is online now
Grand HDF Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hill Country, TX
Posts: 3,744
Received 1,829 Likes on 710 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LDB415
It occurred to me the question of a 96 vs a 103 could apply outside the realm of Softails so I'm asking here where more may see and reply. I'm looking at a 2011 FLSTC at the dealer with 15,225 miles on it. It has V&H BSL pipes, stage 1 intake, some kind of tuner plus several smaller extras like a windshield bag, small luggage rack, ISO-grips and a few covers etc. on it. They are asking $17,100 for it plus TTL etc.. The bike was bought new from them and all work and add ons were done in their shop.

My riding style is casual for want of a better term. My hero is the tortoise not the hare. I doubt I would ride over the speed limit more than 0.00173% of the time. Most of the time I'd likely be a few mph below the speed limit. I want to see the ride. That's a big part of it to me. That's much better and easier done riding casually.

So, that said, you guys with lots more FLSTC experience than I, how does that bike sound and what would be a reasonable offer on it? How does the 96 compare to the 103? With those pipes and intake and tuner am I likely to get better or worse than stock fuel mpg or be basically the same? What else should I know about or look into or be wary of? Thanks for any and all input on this.
NADA book values are as follows: Low retail: $13,985. Average retail:$17,455.
KBB retail book value for that bike is $16,200, and that's in excellent condition.
KBB trade in value was $13,750.

That being said, we all know that NADA and KBB retail values are grossly inflated for current economic conditions. I'd offer $13,750, and go from there. $17,100 is way high for the current market…but hey, they're a dealer, and it's their job to *** rape you.

As for the differences between the 96 and the 103 engine…don't concern yourself about it. With your self described riding style, a stock 96" engine is more than enough for you.
 
  #7  
Old 08-12-2012, 08:37 PM
RUThinking's Avatar
RUThinking
RUThinking is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I recently traded in an 08 Ultra Classic for a 12 Road Glide Ultra. If you ride around town I doubt you will see a difference. If you tour the country the difference is night and day. There were times I simply lacked power with the 96 and as someone mentioned there was no power in 6th gear. In fact if I was fighting a strong head wind I often rode in 5th gear. I also had to downshift when riding hills. I expect that some of the time, there were times though the grade was minor. The issue was the distance of the increased grade.

The 103 on the other hand... Just completed a trip to Sturgis, never felt like I had a lack of power, including when I was in 6th gear. Shoot I passed people in 6th gear, something I would have never considered with the 96.

At this time my 103 is stock, I had completed stage 1 on the 96. I'll also throw in I am getting noticeably better mileage. Some of that is due to the difference in the fairings.
 

Last edited by RUThinking; 08-12-2012 at 08:40 PM.
  #8  
Old 08-12-2012, 08:46 PM
themensh's Avatar
themensh
themensh is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: north of Daytona
Posts: 5,331
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

My experience with softails. I owned a 2000 Fatboy. Removable bags, road king windshield, solo seat. Rode the bike long distance (8 hours to destination). Loved that bike. I finally ended up with my Ultra with a 103CI. I just think back to my FLSTF....and IF it had a 103.
Heck....I wish I had the Fatboy back in the state I sold it! A 103 would have been sweet.

Chuck
 
  #9  
Old 08-12-2012, 08:50 PM
omaho5's Avatar
omaho5
omaho5 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Concord NH
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just bought a 2012 FLHR with anti lock, security, and speed control...BLACK.
Out the door for $16,900.00 . The best any other dealer would do was $18,400.
This company is trying to hose you.
The 103 is a nice engine and takes 6th nicely at 55MPH
 
  #10  
Old 08-12-2012, 08:56 PM
agueybana's Avatar
agueybana
agueybana is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Virgirnia
Posts: 1,104
Received 44 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

17 grant with 15k miles??? ...too much money, i paid 15 grant with only 2k miles and they gave me a $1,000 dollar gift card!!
 


Quick Reply: 96 vs. 103 engines??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 PM.