What do you think of the Street 750/500? (moved by FXD2003Rider)
#31
#32
The Honda Ascot VT500 was an exceptionally good motorcycle in 1983-84 (it's only two years of production) but a 30 year old used motorcycle hardly compares with a new 2015 Street 500.
Currently Honda offers the 750cc V-Twin Shadow with an MRSP of $7500 (the same as the 2015 Street 750) and the CBR500 Parallel Twin with an MSRP of $6300 ($400 less than the 2015 Street 500). If you'd rather ride a Honda as opposed to a Harley then go for it.
Currently Honda offers the 750cc V-Twin Shadow with an MRSP of $7500 (the same as the 2015 Street 750) and the CBR500 Parallel Twin with an MSRP of $6300 ($400 less than the 2015 Street 500). If you'd rather ride a Honda as opposed to a Harley then go for it.
I wouldn't even consider the street 500 and 750 with those bikes out there if you don't need the Harley name. Cheaper and more fun bikes out there. Most people looking at 500-750cc bikes usually look for a cheaper and more economical bike for commuting IMO.
#33
My wife bought one in June. Perfect for her, she's small. I took for a ride and that thing is a blast. Quick and with the six speed fast. Metric just wasn't going to look right in the garage next to my shovel bigger and CVO ultra. Great for me, she's off mine and on her own.
Service is easy. Neutral was tough at first but now she's mastered it. Red sunflower with the black looks good. Agreed horn and wiring look cheap, but I hear MOCO has stuff in the works for that. Face it we all go back for customized stuff
Service is easy. Neutral was tough at first but now she's mastered it. Red sunflower with the black looks good. Agreed horn and wiring look cheap, but I hear MOCO has stuff in the works for that. Face it we all go back for customized stuff
#34
The same is true for the larger touring motorcycles as well. That's why a lot of people opt for a Gold Wing over a Road King or Street Glide. If the Harley name has no meaning for the rider then there are less expensive options for them.
#36
But...
Harley doesn't have any heritage in this class. There is no mystique to cheaply built, made in India (I think) commuter bikes. It's like Ferrari building a minivan. Their racing heritage would mean very little. So Harley making the street doesn't add anything to the equation, for me anyway. The street really is a bike that needs to stand on its own, and the non Harley owners that have reviewed it don't seem to be very favorable. If there was no logo on this bike and you put a hundred people in it how many would guess Harley?
#37
I get what you are saying. I even agree. I just bought a 2009 road king for the same price as I could have gotten a brand new moto guzzi California 1400 just because of what it means to be a Harley.
But...
Harley doesn't have any heritage in this class. There is no mystique to cheaply built, made in India (I think) commuter bikes. It's like Ferrari building a minivan. Their racing heritage would mean very little. So Harley making the street doesn't add anything to the equation, for me anyway. The street really is a bike that needs to stand on its own, and the non Harley owners that have reviewed it don't seem to be very favorable. If there was no logo on this bike and you put a hundred people in it how many would guess Harley?
But...
Harley doesn't have any heritage in this class. There is no mystique to cheaply built, made in India (I think) commuter bikes. It's like Ferrari building a minivan. Their racing heritage would mean very little. So Harley making the street doesn't add anything to the equation, for me anyway. The street really is a bike that needs to stand on its own, and the non Harley owners that have reviewed it don't seem to be very favorable. If there was no logo on this bike and you put a hundred people in it how many would guess Harley?
Additionally if we look back at Harley history it has produced motorcycles of virtually all displacements from 50cc (e.g. M50) and up and in both 4-stroke and 2-stroke designs. The 45 cid flathead Harley of the 1940's was 740cc for example and the Harley Hummers of the 1950's came is several displacement sizes.
It also has extensive history with overseas production with the Aermacchi Harley-Davidsons that were produced in Italy when Harley owned majority control of Aermacchi. I recently spent about four years (and way too much money LOL) on a bolt-up restoration of a 1976 Aermacchi Harley-Davidson SS-250 (2-stroke) to museum quality.
I would recommend that anyone believing there is no heritage related to the Street Harley-Davidsons do a little more research on the history of Harley-Davidson. If we look at the 111 years of Harley-Davidson history it pretty much covers everything on two wheels. Harley even produced golf carts at one time.
I would finally note that while some cost cutting measures were used such as the plastic radiator shroud and grill and the omission of a chrome horn cover to keep the MSRP down that the heart of the Street, the engine/tranny, is top of the line. No corners were cut related to to the engine or tranny. Of course anyone that knows the V-Rod would also know this Harley even if the logos were removed.
Last edited by smokindownthehwy; 12-21-2014 at 12:48 PM.
#38
I get what you are saying. I even agree. I just bought a 2009 road king for the same price as I could have gotten a brand new moto guzzi California 1400 just because of what it means to be a Harley.
But...
Harley doesn't have any heritage in this class. There is no mystique to cheaply built, made in India (I think) commuter bikes.
But...
Harley doesn't have any heritage in this class. There is no mystique to cheaply built, made in India (I think) commuter bikes.
I think it's great that Harley has a starter bike with a Harley Davidson badge.
When I get to old for heavy Touring bikes, I would have no problem buying one for my self.
#39
I don't think there is anything wrong with the bike being made in India. And I know Harley's were smaller too. That lesson was reinforced for me a few weeks ago at the Harley museum were there were some beautiful smaller bikes and of course the older bikes were just smaller by nature. But in my own, limited personal opinion I just don't see a tie that binds the street to those bikes (including that beautiful two stroke pictured above). I'm sure there are but I personally don't see them. One of the coolest things about the museum was I felt I could see so many visual And mechanical cues that linked bikes from each era - not just cosmetic either. And I'm sure you'll be able to point out all the cues I'm missing. But with a triumph bonneville costing $600 more , a moto guzzi v7 costing a $1000 more - and that before any specials that bring both bikes way closer - I can't see buying a street. I'm not even bringing any Honda shadow rs or that new retro Yamaha into the picture. Heck i would even buy another Indian made bike over this one - a royal enfeld. I've ridden all of the bikes I've discussed. I just can't tell I'm on a Harley when I'm on the street.
Last edited by Tilter; 12-22-2014 at 06:47 AM.
#40
I think they're HD's attempt to swap their fleet of Buell Blasts in Rider's Edge and appeal to this booming market of people who want an efficient means to travel in times of higher fuel prices. Well, the fuel problem's getting resolved so guessing these bike's will be treated the same as Nintendo's ET video game...