Milwaukee Eight (M8) 2017 and up M8 Air and Liquid Cooled discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Oil verse water

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-29-2016, 04:34 PM
Vegas99's Avatar
Vegas99
Vegas99 is offline
Stage III
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vero beach,fl
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Oil verse water

Is there a difference in horse power between water cooled 107 to air cooled?
 
  #2  
Old 09-29-2016, 05:43 PM
scottt's Avatar
scottt
scottt is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,878
Received 164 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

The water cooled heads will run cooler than the oil cooled brother and maintain a more consistent ideal temperature resulting in a better performing motor.

That said, I think the new oil cooled heads are a brilliant way to help cool an air/oil cooled motor.
 
  #3  
Old 09-30-2016, 07:38 AM
ocezam's Avatar
ocezam
ocezam is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 1,145
Received 96 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I would agree with Scottt.

There has been a little evidence on the internet that the "twin Cooled" engines run about 50 degrees cooler than the oil cooled heads. That in theory would provide a minor and more consistent performance increase. However the "twin cooled" engines are also in a bit heavier bike than the base 107. I'd think that would negate any minor performance increase.

Personally I'd be more comfortable starting a serious performance build on any of the twin cooled bikes than on my new StreetGlide.
 
  #4  
Old 09-30-2016, 02:15 PM
Prot's Avatar
Prot
Prot is offline
Club Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 21,758
Received 14,161 Likes on 6,216 Posts
Default

The turnoff for some regarding water cooling is additional unnecessary complexity.
 
  #5  
Old 10-02-2016, 11:53 AM
NORTY FLATZ's Avatar
NORTY FLATZ
NORTY FLATZ is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sandy Eggo's North County
Posts: 14,586
Received 5,384 Likes on 2,951 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Prot
The turnoff for some regarding water cooling is additional unnecessary complexity.
At the expense of 30% less torque?
 
  #6  
Old 10-02-2016, 03:54 PM
scottt's Avatar
scottt
scottt is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,878
Received 164 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Prot
The turnoff for some regarding water cooling is additional unnecessary complexity.
From my personal experience, the twin cooled system simply works great. I have been riding Harley's since 1989, my twin cooled 14 Limited is the first ride without any heat concerns. Once broken in, the radiator fans seldom run and I live in a warm climate.

With all this said, I think the new M8 air/oil cooled heads are a great design. Simply not as effective as the water cooled heads. Everything has tradeoffs.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by scottt:
MikeyTX (10-09-2016), ocezam (10-02-2016)
  #7  
Old 10-09-2016, 06:47 PM
MrHd1's Avatar
MrHd1
MrHd1 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 452
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If the M8s are similar to the TCs, the advantage in the twin cooled version is the ability to maintain its timing when very warm. In so doing, power is not lost due to retarded timing.
 
The following users liked this post:
ocezam (10-09-2016)
  #8  
Old 10-09-2016, 08:51 PM
Prot's Avatar
Prot
Prot is offline
Club Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 21,758
Received 14,161 Likes on 6,216 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NORTY FLATZ
At the expense of 30% less torque?
The twin cooled engines DO NOT have 30% more torque.
 
  #9  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:32 PM
lh4x4's Avatar
lh4x4
lh4x4 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 13,402
Received 929 Likes on 571 Posts
Default

You will not find much difference. Yes coolant sheds heat a little faster than oil.

However with Syn oil which has low viscosity is close in heat dissipation. Why to you think engines run cooler with it instead of mineral oil?

So with a much larger oil cooler than in the past and a third larger oil capacity and higher flow oil pump it would be hard to show any difference.

To H-D's credit they run the water pump different than previous wet heads. The coolant temp is no longer controlled by a thermostat but by the ECM. The ECM controls the pump speed when the sensors tell the ECM the head temp the ECM slows or speeds the pump to control the temp within a certain range.

My preference is the oil cooled. Less parts, less maintenance and less weight.

It has worked well for years on my 08 Buell Ulysses and 09 XR1200 which have oil cooled heads.

30% less torque??? How about this example. 2012 CVO 110 spec 122 ft lbs of torque and 9.12:1 compression. Now the 16 CVO twin cooled 115 ft lbs and 9.5:1 compression.

My 12 CVO out runs my 16 CVO any day of the week.

By the way spec's on 17 M8 whether oil or coolant are IDENTICAL.The ECM in twin cams only reduced timing when KNOCK was detected not by temp.
 

Last edited by lh4x4; 10-09-2016 at 10:39 PM.
  #10  
Old 10-10-2016, 07:26 AM
Cobra1's Avatar
Cobra1
Cobra1 is online now
Road Warrior

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: DeLand, Florida
Posts: 1,837
Received 1,289 Likes on 523 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lh4x4
30% less torque??? How about this example. 2012 CVO 110 spec 122 ft lbs of torque and 9.12:1 compression. Now the 16 CVO twin cooled 115 ft lbs and 9.5:1 compression.
I am not going to argue your torque numbers but your math is just wrong. 115 is just 6% lower than 122 not 30%. Just sayin
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DamifIknow
Milwaukee Eight (M8)
59
09-01-2023 04:25 PM
gerald martin
General Harley Davidson Chat
17
12-04-2018 12:39 PM
dstrat1
Touring Models
11
08-22-2012 09:14 AM
chuckyp
Dyna Glide Models
2
07-08-2006 01:01 PM
fl_799
Dyna Glide Models
18
05-18-2006 01:07 AM



Quick Reply: Oil verse water



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.