Shovelhead A place to talk about Shovelheads.

Terrible MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-06-2016, 05:48 PM
LostInNM's Avatar
LostInNM
LostInNM is offline
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Corrales, NM
Posts: 43
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Terrible MPG

Getting about 27 MPG on my 83 FLH with S&S carb.
Carb has been cleaned and rebuilt (my me).
Plugs kinds sooty so went leaner on jetting.
Slight backfire on deceleration now - so I think it is close.
Is this the normal mileage for the old shovel engine?
 
  #2  
Old 03-06-2016, 05:53 PM
FL54's Avatar
FL54
FL54 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,018
Received 415 Likes on 286 Posts
Default

Seems on the low side.
My '69 FLH with a Bendix carb consistently gets in the 33-35 MPG range.
 
  #3  
Old 03-06-2016, 06:00 PM
TwiZted Biker's Avatar
TwiZted Biker
TwiZted Biker is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Niles Canyon Ca.
Posts: 64,385
Received 47,828 Likes on 17,453 Posts
Default

Bit low which carb you have an older " B " or the shorter " E " , B's got around 35 average and the E's should roll the low 40's depending a few things and your tune.

Hit S&S's website and read the E setup & tuning guide it's free and easy to follow.
 
  #4  
Old 03-06-2016, 07:47 PM
Racepres's Avatar
Racepres
Racepres is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cental, MI
Posts: 6,939
Received 2,050 Likes on 1,508 Posts
Default

LMAO
I knew it was gonna be an S&S Carb...
Everyone always tunes 'em Fat!!!
 
  #5  
Old 03-06-2016, 08:23 PM
TwiZted Biker's Avatar
TwiZted Biker
TwiZted Biker is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Niles Canyon Ca.
Posts: 64,385
Received 47,828 Likes on 17,453 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Racepres
LMAO
I knew it was gonna be an S&S Carb...
Everyone always tunes 'em Fat!!!
That's because most guys are tuning around the intakes leaks they never fix.
 
  #6  
Old 03-06-2016, 11:06 PM
Racepres's Avatar
Racepres
Racepres is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cental, MI
Posts: 6,939
Received 2,050 Likes on 1,508 Posts
Default

Very true, but, even without leaks, most run it too rich...they do work better that way, Unless you know how to Properly tune a Thunderjet equipped one.
 
The following users liked this post:
kona74 (10-09-2022)
  #7  
Old 03-06-2016, 11:29 PM
TwiZted Biker's Avatar
TwiZted Biker
TwiZted Biker is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Niles Canyon Ca.
Posts: 64,385
Received 47,828 Likes on 17,453 Posts
Default

Yeah they do like a hair fat on a shovel.
 
  #8  
Old 03-07-2016, 07:01 AM
LostInNM's Avatar
LostInNM
LostInNM is offline
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Corrales, NM
Posts: 43
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TwiZted Biker
Bit low which carb you have an older " B " or the shorter " E " , B's got around 35 average and the E's should roll the low 40's depending a few things and your tune.

Hit S&S's website and read the E setup & tuning guide it's free and easy to follow.
It is the "E" version. I will check the website for tuning tips. Thanks.
My indie mechanic has a dyno and seems to know how to tune older iron, so that may be another (expensive) option.

Also wondering if there is some other components (not just the carb) that could cause this. Valves? Timing? Ignition?
 

Last edited by LostInNM; 03-07-2016 at 08:14 AM.
  #9  
Old 03-07-2016, 10:59 AM
Racepres's Avatar
Racepres
Racepres is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cental, MI
Posts: 6,939
Received 2,050 Likes on 1,508 Posts
Default

Like TwiZted has said
Intake leaks are the Number one problem
Masked by tuning very Rich
 
  #10  
Old 03-07-2016, 12:00 PM
Squidbilly*'s Avatar
Squidbilly*
Squidbilly* is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ashtabula Ohio
Posts: 707
Received 162 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LostInNM
Getting about 27 MPG on my 83 FLH with S&S carb.
Carb has been cleaned and rebuilt (my me).
Plugs kinds sooty so went leaner on jetting.
Slight backfire on deceleration now - so I think it is close.
Is this the normal mileage for the old shovel engine?
You runnin drag pipes by chance?
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Squidbilly*:
Racepres (10-10-2022), Y2K (10-10-2022)


Quick Reply: Terrible MPG



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.