Softail Models Standard, Custom, Night Train, Deuce, Springer, Heritage, Fatboy, Deluxe, Rocker and Cross Bones.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fat Boy vs. Fat Boy Lo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 08-09-2011, 09:49 AM
Zakk13's Avatar
Zakk13
Zakk13 is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The Rust Belt!
Posts: 3,207
Received 636 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Misbehaven
It's the longer rod that makes the shocks lower. Look at the lower kits that have been used. They all are longer rods.
Well you could be right.. But no matter what eighter way its the center rods. Its not the shock like everyone thinks. The shocks themselves will perform nearly the same as far as ride quality!
 
  #22  
Old 08-09-2011, 09:54 AM
tmitchellof PG's Avatar
tmitchellof PG
tmitchellof PG is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Punta Gorda,FL
Posts: 3,718
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I have a 2005 SE Fat Boy which comes stock with the low profile shocks just like the Deluxe.
I always assumed that the Fat Boy LO had the same setup.
You will get a harsher ride because of the low profile shocks. It is the same scenario as the shocks on the Street Guide will give a harsher ride compared to the other bagger models, with the regular shocks.
Tom
 
  #23  
Old 08-09-2011, 10:01 AM
Zakk13's Avatar
Zakk13
Zakk13 is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The Rust Belt!
Posts: 3,207
Received 636 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tmitchellof PG
I have a 2005 SE Fat Boy which comes stock with the low profile shocks just like the Deluxe.
I always assumed that the Fat Boy LO had the same setup.
You will get a harsher ride because of the low profile shocks. It is the same scenario as the shocks on the Street Guide will give a harsher ride compared to the other bagger models, with the regular shocks.
Tom
I thought the new shocks on the newer bikes are better. Thats why you hear alot of guys saying the Lo rides better then there old fatboy even dd! Anway im not a shock condasore but all i can say is i took both the Fatboy and the Fatboy Lo for a ride. Only difference was in the seat! And that was last year when the Fatboy had a different seat then the Lo. This year they both come with the same exact seats.. As far as rid quality i couldnt tell any difference at all. You just sit a tiny bit lower in the Lo and the bike is blacked out.
 
  #24  
Old 08-09-2011, 03:04 PM
hacksawsgarage's Avatar
hacksawsgarage
hacksawsgarage is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Misbehaven
height and suspension wise on the Fatboy LO's 2010-2012 I don't think has changed and for the standard Fatboy the only reason I see a drop in the height is because of the different seat. If your riding ridgid now or have in the past you will love the ride of the new Fatboy. Like I mentioned My new Lo is night and day compared to my old 96 Evo FB.
interesting. i had a 95FB, assuming not much diff between that and your old 96. so i ask, whats nite and day? and is it all good?

my only real issue with the 95 was after along hard ride at speed , i would be tingling from head to toe. i had the EVwhatever cam in it. and of course it could have used an overdrive gear. but it handled pretty well actually. the seat was a board, but it had room to squirm, and it was pretty easy to understand simple machine.

i am not really a fan of the fat tyres of the new ones , and even though i love the ease of closed loop EFI on my dyna, i still think a fuel pump is just one more thing to go wrong and strand you.
103 Cubic inches wouldnt be hard to take though.
 
  #25  
Old 08-09-2011, 03:16 PM
hacksawsgarage's Avatar
hacksawsgarage
hacksawsgarage is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default ummmmmm.....

Originally Posted by Zakk13
I thought the new shocks on the newer bikes are better. Thats why you hear alot of guys saying the Lo rides better then there old fatboy even dd! Anway im not a shock condasore but all i can say is i took both the Fatboy and the Fatboy Lo for a ride. Only difference was in the seat! And that was last year when the Fatboy had a different seat then the Lo. This year they both come with the same exact seats.. As far as rid quality i couldnt tell any difference at all. You just sit a tiny bit lower in the Lo and the bike is blacked out.
HD website shows them to have difference seats for 2012.
if the rod length is diff, then i would assume shock travel is diff?
it sounds like the longer rod = less travel. the ride would be the same under most circumstances, but the larger the road irregularity, the more chance of bottoming for the longer rod shock.

and why does the Lo list over 700lbs and the regular model 695? those must be really heavy longer shock rods.
 
  #26  
Old 08-09-2011, 04:19 PM
Chunk's Avatar
Chunk
Chunk is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jaburg1
I'd get the Lo and put a solo sprung seat on it
I like the way that seat starts, sort of, seperating the continuity of the bikes lines while keeping it together.
 
  #27  
Old 08-09-2011, 04:26 PM
Kojax's Avatar
Kojax
Kojax is offline
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: haverhill mass
Posts: 4,673
Received 139 Likes on 94 Posts
Angry seats

i thibk harley drop the ball this year. the stanard fatboy harley should of kept the stanard seat and tank patch it looked good to me. this is how harley saves money........it stinks
 
  #28  
Old 08-10-2011, 02:33 PM
Zakk13's Avatar
Zakk13
Zakk13 is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The Rust Belt!
Posts: 3,207
Received 636 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hacksawsgarage
HD website shows them to have difference seats for 2012.
if the rod length is diff, then i would assume shock travel is diff?
it sounds like the longer rod = less travel. the ride would be the same under most circumstances, but the larger the road irregularity, the more chance of bottoming for the longer rod shock.

and why does the Lo list over 700lbs and the regular model 695? those must be really heavy longer shock rods.
Ya i know the website shows different seats especially if you look at the side buy side comparison chart! but i have the 2012 book and they have the same seats and if you look at the big pictures in the softail section of the website you can see the seat is the same their too! Also i realize they have different size shocks and like i said the rod sizes are different and less travel and so on but im telling you when i took these 2 for a ride i felt no major noticable difference at all.. As far as the weight goes i would guess its a couple little things adding up like longer rods in the shocks and all that powder coating on the parts adds up to that extra small 5 pounds! Between the two bikes you cant go wrong with either, just pick the one you think looks better thats what i did, and i bought the Lo!
 
  #29  
Old 08-10-2011, 06:31 PM
Misbehaven's Avatar
Misbehaven
Misbehaven is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sheboygan,Wi
Posts: 4,501
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hacksawsgarage
interesting. i had a 95FB, assuming not much diff between that and your old 96. so i ask, whats nite and day? and is it all good?

my only real issue with the 95 was after along hard ride at speed , i would be tingling from head to toe. i had the EVwhatever cam in it. and of course it could have used an overdrive gear. but it handled pretty well actually. the seat was a board, but it had room to squirm, and it was pretty easy to understand simple machine.

i am not really a fan of the fat tyres of the new ones , and even though i love the ease of closed loop EFI on my dyna, i still think a fuel pump is just one more thing to go wrong and strand you.
103 Cubic inches wouldnt be hard to take though.
Night and day may have been a little exaggerated but the newer FB's seem to ride smoother and I feel the handling is better. Defiantly an improvement vibration wise with counter balanced motor. BTW I am pushing 280 and the 140 we ride 2 up a lot and I have not bottomed out yet.
 

Last edited by Misbehaven; 08-10-2011 at 06:38 PM.
  #30  
Old 08-10-2011, 09:13 PM
Leviticus88's Avatar
Leviticus88
Leviticus88 is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My Lo rode like a dream all weekend in Sturgis. Put 1200 Miles on total in 3 days. Rode 400 Miles there and then 400 Miles back plus long rides all day in the black hills. rarely stopped but for fuel and food. The bike rode great, smooth and handles amazing in the corners. I wouldn't worry about ride quality compared to another softail. Just get the one you like and enjoy it!

After the trip, I have added lower heat shields to the wish list because the bike gets damn hot sitting in traffic!
 


Quick Reply: Fat Boy vs. Fat Boy Lo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.