883 vs 1200 The real story?
#1
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: 40.2444° N, 75.6419° W
Posts: 34,846
Received 17,569 Likes
on
9,797 Posts
883 vs 1200 The real story?
I have been reading debates about this for a while. I bought an 883 and at the time cost was a factor. I remember doing research on the web and had my mind set on a 2005 XLH 883. Of course the salesperson showed me the 1200, but I wanted a Vivid Black 883 with the "sportster" decal on the side. I remember the sales person (who was a woman) tell me that "there is not that much difference in power". Like I said cost was an issue and I wanted to keep it under ten grand. I didn't egret my 883 and still own it, although I did also eventually pick up a Super Glide. I have heard the difference between 883-1200 is night and day, and I have also heard people praise the 883 saying it is no slouch. My question is, has anyone ever had the two side by side and rode one, then switched to the other for a comparison? I feel this is the only real way to make an informed decision, I couldn't sell my 883 for example then a few years later ride a 1200 and make an accurate call on this.
Last edited by Super Glidester; 06-04-2015 at 02:52 PM.
#2
The following 2 users liked this post by Greezey Rider:
MidnightXL883 (06-08-2021),
Richnutt (05-09-2022)
#3
I have a 2012 iron 883 and I think it has plenty of power I have never ridden a 1200 but I would imagine unless you are racing a 1200 you probably wouldn't notice much difference. I've heard the big difference is that the 1200's weigh less and are geared differently. Have not researched this myself
#4
Traffic light to traffic light, the 883 typically does a pretty fair job staying with a 1200. But the 883 has a lower gear ratio than the 1200 which is what helps it off the line against the 1200. Get up to higher (highway) speeds, and the acceleration difference when you whack the throttle open is quite noticeable.
#5
The following users liked this post:
MidnightXL883 (06-08-2021)
#6
#7
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SW FL-Jersey Shore Emigre
Posts: 5,454
Received 2,858 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
The following 2 users liked this post by shorelasHD:
LordSargon (06-08-2021),
TUCCI (07-26-2020)
Trending Topics
#9
10. Suzuki GSX-R600 (2001+)
Engine: 599cc, 16-valve, injected, four
Power: 112bhp
Torque: 51 lb/ft
Weight: 163kg
Top Speed: 160mph
Read more: http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-...#ixzz3c8X3h5z2
05. Triumph Daytona 600/650 (2003-2005)
Engine: 599cc, 16-valve, fuel-injected, four
Power: 112bhp
Torque: 50 lb/ft
Weight: 165kg
Top speed: 160mph
Engine: 599cc, 16-valve, injected, four
Power: 112bhp
Torque: 51 lb/ft
Weight: 163kg
Top Speed: 160mph
Read more: http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle-...#ixzz3c8X3h5z2
05. Triumph Daytona 600/650 (2003-2005)
Engine: 599cc, 16-valve, fuel-injected, four
Power: 112bhp
Torque: 50 lb/ft
Weight: 165kg
Top speed: 160mph
The following users liked this post:
LordSargon (06-08-2021)
#10
Ive had both at the same time and cHarley is spot on. Around town just cruising around, really not that much difference. Even on the interstate, it can easily keep speed loaded or not. Its when you go to pass someone thats doing 58 in a 60...........thats when the grunt of the 1200 is most noticeable to me.
Blue was my 883, if I had kept it at some point I would probably put a 1250 kit in it.
Blue was my 883, if I had kept it at some point I would probably put a 1250 kit in it.