The Dyno RoomA special room dedicated for Dyno tuning products, troubleshooting and results. All Gearheads and Dyno Operators are welcome here as well as the guys that are new to tuning. Please see the special rules for this section before posting.
I like my Power Vision from DynoJet. Had the guys at Fuel Moto put a tune on it for my setup and after a few days of autotuning my bike runs great. I think you should decide how and where you want to tune your bike and use the tuner recommended by wherever you get your bike tuned. Fuel Moto is a great outfit to do business with and they recommend the Power Vision
Installed a V & H FP3 today. So far so good. Going to set up an auto tune session for my 2011 HD Heritage Softail Classic with a Stage 1 Air Kit, Rush slip-ons with 2.25" baffles, and Stage 1 Big Bore Kit making it 103 CI.
With using them all. I prefer the TTS for the most useful tables and the documentation. That explain what to do and how to deal with the different tables.
So is this really a conversation as to what Harley Hidden Tables are chosen by the company to be exposed? And what critical data fields they elect to expose?
Is this between HD Pro Super Tuner, TTS, PV Standard and PV Target Tune?
So is this really a conversation as to what Harley Hidden Tables are chosen by the company to be exposed? And what critical data fields they elect to expose?
Is this between HD Pro Super Tuner, TTS, PV Standard and PV Target Tune?
Also has something to do with the directions and tools that come with each program as well. For example both the Vision and TTS expose EGR/ CDE tables. One has clear cut directions and explanation on how to use the table. Has a wash program that will deal with these tables if the user decides to. The other one? They refer you to the other for directions.
For me it is more than a table count of Harley "hidden" tables. It has to do with useful exposed tables that actually help you tune the bike. It has to do with tools and programs built in that help validate changes to these tables.
The title of this thread is "Which tuner do you like". For me it depends on the application and what all the end user wants to do with it. If a customer comes in and wants a tune and just wants to enjoy his bike when he's done, he should save the money and get the TTS over the PV, if he wants to monitor ET's economy, etc. then I recommend the PV over the TTS. I think the thing that is most over looked in these topics is that the mass majority of MC riders out there actually want to just ride. The percentage of people that want to learn about tuning and spend the time/money learning, logging, autotuning etc. is very small.
I spent my money on a Dynojet Powevision and have been satisfied with the results so far. I am only using the basic NB setup at present. I plan on doing cam change and possibly more in the near future.
On that power vision where will you get a map for the cams or will you just take it to a shop and have them tune it? I am planning on putting some cams in my bike and was looking at the power vision but on there website I didn't find a map for my bike with a cam. I am working on getting full exh system and an intake and do all of it at one point in time.