TTS: '08 Ultra build
#11
#12
Yeah no doubt about it, big changes in VE tables. I am at 100 miles with 5 vtune runs, the peaks are coming down from 102.5 to 96.5, the valleys are coming up into the 80's.
Am I looking to flatten the VE tables with a high efficiency? The bike is running real good.
I have to keep under 3500 RPM up to 1000 miles. Then I can let it rip. We're expecting a blizzard, so I must be patient.
Am I looking to flatten the VE tables with a high efficiency? The bike is running real good.
I have to keep under 3500 RPM up to 1000 miles. Then I can let it rip. We're expecting a blizzard, so I must be patient.
#13
If you mean flat, as in the same everywhere? No- the tables will look like waves, and that makes sense- you don't have the same airflow/fuel requirements at 50 MPH down hill vs 50 MPH going uphill vs 50 MPH on flat level ground.
#14
#15
Okay; update. I now have 17 tuning runs in. I did the first 15 with no spark assist, O2 closed loop with auto-extend. The last 2 with spark assist, O2 closed loop with auto-extend. The early break-in miles were done on back country roads and I was very happy with the performance. Recently I have been commuting to work and on the highway I got nothing. It accelerates well up to ~70 but that is it. No matter how much throttle I give it I get nothing more. It has got worse over the last 3 tunes. I compared the VE tables from the original rebuild tune to the latest cal, and a very deep "valley" has been created between 2500 and 3500 rpm at all throttle positions. I have applied EGR changes every time, was that a mistake. At this point I am thinking of starting over again with the original cal DAG205-004, do camtune and continue. Any thoughts?
#16
Okay; update. I now have 17 tuning runs in. I did the first 15 with no spark assist, O2 closed loop with auto-extend. The last 2 with spark assist, O2 closed loop with auto-extend. The early break-in miles were done on back country roads and I was very happy with the performance. Recently I have been commuting to work and on the highway I got nothing. It accelerates well up to ~70 but that is it. No matter how much throttle I give it I get nothing more. It has got worse over the last 3 tunes. I compared the VE tables from the original rebuild tune to the latest cal, and a very deep "valley" has been created between 2500 and 3500 rpm at all throttle positions. I have applied EGR changes every time, was that a mistake. At this point I am thinking of starting over again with the original cal DAG205-004, do camtune and continue. Any thoughts?
#17
#18
I need to replace the starter clutch so the bike is in my shop. I replaced the old O2 sensors with new HD ones, I'll check how deep they are in the exhaust. I was wondering about the 2 that I got for the cams, so I plan on doing the camtune again and see what I get this time. The 2 was the 1st deflection on the graph. Could I go up one number?
#19
Well, I am done with my starter(didn't find anything wrong). I checked the bungs on the S&S pipes and they are the same depth as the stock pipes. O2 sensors are screwed all the way in. Would I be able to look at my recordings to get an idea if I am getting usable data from those sensors. Doing the oil change this afternoon, my shed is like a sauna right now. After that I will put the starting cal back in and do a camtune. This time I will pay closer attention to the results from the Vtune.
#20
Well, I am done with my starter(didn't find anything wrong). I checked the bungs on the S&S pipes and they are the same depth as the stock pipes. O2 sensors are screwed all the way in. Would I be able to look at my recordings to get an idea if I am getting usable data from those sensors. Doing the oil change this afternoon, my shed is like a sauna right now. After that I will put the starting cal back in and do a camtune. This time I will pay closer attention to the results from the Vtune.