103" Touring Cams-TTS-100
#61
Not attempting to derail this thread or get into a which cam is better discussion. TTS-100 are a very good choice for baggers. In fact, if it were not for the premium price, I would have considered them. However, seeing the above dyno sheet with the 57's dyno in red is VERY VERY VERY suspect!! !! !! Did I say VERY!!! lol
#62
Cool, not the tuner then. Something is not quite right. It would be interesting to know why it tuned so light. Did the tuner/shop install the cams? Could it be sumping holding it back? Dont know, just guessing....
Last edited by KumaRide; 08-23-2016 at 09:04 AM.
#63
Could be a stingy dyno, some of the DJ250's are more stingy than the older models. I had a build tuned on a old DJ150 and the same build run on a DJ250, the 150 gave the build 104/100 and the DJ250 only gave 98/96.
#65
lol My apologies, miscommunication. I was still referring to the dyno sheet that was posted comparing the tts100 to 57's. The 57's run is WAY off. I am certain you are smiling with every twist of the throttle!!
#66
I took it out today and am so impressed! The throttle response is solid, definitely a seat of the pants difference. Honestly without being cliché it rides different...I mean involuntary smile when you go different. I hope I never get used to it.
#67
Welp never mind on my previous sentiment...glad I got it done!
I took it out today and am so impressed! The throttle response is solid, definitely a seat of the pants difference. Honestly without being cliché it rides different...I mean involuntary smile when you go different. I hope I never get used to it.
I took it out today and am so impressed! The throttle response is solid, definitely a seat of the pants difference. Honestly without being cliché it rides different...I mean involuntary smile when you go different. I hope I never get used to it.
#68
#69
Yes, the FM 107" kit should provide more.
#70