how much longer till harley motors get larger?
#51
Escalade, if you want bigger engines whether you need it or not, why not get a boss hoss? Its American made and comes in at what....350 cubic inches?
There is a reason everyone isn't riding around on them, besides price, size becomes ridiculous, inefficient, even dangerous because of the detrimental effects to handling.
Here is a benchmark for Harley, build the bike with lighter, stronger metals, that is effectively making the engine more powerful and improving handling and efficiency without even touching the engine. Then with not much re-tooling they could get 20 more hp stock. That would produce a great bike without adding more heat, weight, fuel consumption, decreasing range and handling.
If they really wanted to get crazy they could try this:
http://contest.techbriefs.com/2013/e...hnologies/3800
Producing an engine with a combustion chamber on each side of the piston would double the cubic inches as far as output without adding any size at all. New tech, long way off I know but this is the kind of radical thing that exists that Harley will be 20 years behind the curve on, which is the very reason most people choose Harleys to begin with. Something to be said for nostalgia. When the world is building the next high tech spaceship, Harley keeps cranking out a classic war horse and we all love them for it.
There is a reason everyone isn't riding around on them, besides price, size becomes ridiculous, inefficient, even dangerous because of the detrimental effects to handling.
Here is a benchmark for Harley, build the bike with lighter, stronger metals, that is effectively making the engine more powerful and improving handling and efficiency without even touching the engine. Then with not much re-tooling they could get 20 more hp stock. That would produce a great bike without adding more heat, weight, fuel consumption, decreasing range and handling.
If they really wanted to get crazy they could try this:
http://contest.techbriefs.com/2013/e...hnologies/3800
Producing an engine with a combustion chamber on each side of the piston would double the cubic inches as far as output without adding any size at all. New tech, long way off I know but this is the kind of radical thing that exists that Harley will be 20 years behind the curve on, which is the very reason most people choose Harleys to begin with. Something to be said for nostalgia. When the world is building the next high tech spaceship, Harley keeps cranking out a classic war horse and we all love them for it.
#52
#53
Escalade, if you want bigger engines whether you need it or not, why not get a boss hoss? Its American made and comes in at what....350 cubic inches?
There is a reason everyone isn't riding around on them, besides price, size becomes ridiculous, inefficient, even dangerous because of the detrimental effects to handling.
Here is a benchmark for Harley, build the bike with lighter, stronger metals, that is effectively making the engine more powerful and improving handling and efficiency without even touching the engine. Then with not much re-tooling they could get 20 more hp stock. That would produce a great bike without adding more heat, weight, fuel consumption, decreasing range and handling.
If they really wanted to get crazy they could try this:
http://contest.techbriefs.com/2013/e...hnologies/3800
Producing an engine with a combustion chamber on each side of the piston would double the cubic inches as far as output without adding any size at all. New tech, long way off I know but this is the kind of radical thing that exists that Harley will be 20 years behind the curve on, which is the very reason most people choose Harleys to begin with. Something to be said for nostalgia. When the world is building the next high tech spaceship, Harley keeps cranking out a classic war horse and we all love them for it.
There is a reason everyone isn't riding around on them, besides price, size becomes ridiculous, inefficient, even dangerous because of the detrimental effects to handling.
Here is a benchmark for Harley, build the bike with lighter, stronger metals, that is effectively making the engine more powerful and improving handling and efficiency without even touching the engine. Then with not much re-tooling they could get 20 more hp stock. That would produce a great bike without adding more heat, weight, fuel consumption, decreasing range and handling.
If they really wanted to get crazy they could try this:
http://contest.techbriefs.com/2013/e...hnologies/3800
Producing an engine with a combustion chamber on each side of the piston would double the cubic inches as far as output without adding any size at all. New tech, long way off I know but this is the kind of radical thing that exists that Harley will be 20 years behind the curve on, which is the very reason most people choose Harleys to begin with. Something to be said for nostalgia. When the world is building the next high tech spaceship, Harley keeps cranking out a classic war horse and we all love them for it.
This. If future high-end models are going to knock on $35K~$40K, I'd want to get my money's worth...so aluminum 7-gallon stretched tank, CF fenders/bags/fairings/panels, light-weight (but stronger) wheels/brake rotors and a 7 or 8 speed tranny so it can have better acceleration and high MPGs to boot!. Hey dreaming costs nothing, is still free
#54
#55
I used to own a Roadliner and you are right, the engine does pull hard.
The brakes are great, the suspension and handling are good (although the bike is just too bloody big). I didn't like that 5th gear is more like 4 1/2
and I got tired of defending the styling of the bike to every *** with an opinion- I liked the styling, it didn't look like every other bike out there.
I have a RK now and it looks exactly the same as a million others.
#56
#57
I have a 15' Ultra Limited. If you are touring the 103 HO is an efficient motor. I don't want them to make the bike lighter to make it faster. The weight of the bike keeps it planted to the ground and more wind resistant. I just did 1500K in Florida a few weeks ago. The bike was flawless. I rode between St. Augustine and Key West. The heat was manageable, first time ever I was able to cruise Main st in Daytona with no heat problems. The bike handled wind and rain at all speeds. I averaged about 45 mpg, at a moving speed. The bike can do 100 mpg all day. Is there a reason to? Even if Harley goes to a 110 or 120. I will keep my 103. What I look for is reliability and efficiency.
#58
#59
This. If future high-end models are going to knock on $35K~$40K, I'd want to get my money's worth...so aluminum 7-gallon stretched tank, CF fenders/bags/fairings/panels, light-weight (but stronger) wheels/brake rotors and a 7 or 8 speed tranny so it can have better acceleration and high MPGs to boot!. Hey dreaming costs nothing, is still free
#60
I used to own a Roadliner and you are right, the engine does pull hard.
The brakes are great, the suspension and handling are good (although the bike is just too bloody big). I didn't like that 5th gear is more like 4 1/2
and I got tired of defending the styling of the bike to every *** with an opinion- I liked the styling, it didn't look like every other bike out there.
I have a RK now and it looks exactly the same as a million others.
The brakes are great, the suspension and handling are good (although the bike is just too bloody big). I didn't like that 5th gear is more like 4 1/2
and I got tired of defending the styling of the bike to every *** with an opinion- I liked the styling, it didn't look like every other bike out there.
I have a RK now and it looks exactly the same as a million others.
Last edited by KCFLHRC; 03-27-2015 at 08:37 AM.