Yeah, 120 torque out of a 103".

Like to know compression myself?

Mind if I test ride it during Daytona bike week? You can have mine.

 

Nice looking numbers! Do you per chance have a sheet using SAE instead of STD as the Dyno scale for comparison?

Is this the H-D stage iii kit part number 92500028?

 

Is it just me or does the 120 torque seem really high to others for stock heads on a 103?

 

I unfortunately don't have that sheet.

But yes it is the kit

 

I don't have anything but I'll be interested to see if I need that. It was a kit from SE.

 

Super tuner.

Dyno work done by Seacoast Harley in Hampton, NH

 

The horsepower number looks about right...but the torque number which says (Est) 120 seems high. I guess you will know if it is close when you ride it.

 

That is where mine was also tuned.

 

The heavy valve springs are unneeded and may cause more wear and stress than by doing good. Also may hold back the build without headwork to support them. Overall not bad but you really only have what cams usually will deliver for power and add a couple ft lbs tq for the compression compared to stock. Not raining on parade but a 107 would have been likely cheaper and better performance. Just cams,good pipe and air cleaner on my 103 dyna was 93/107 sae. Either way enjoy the ride.

 

I'm getting ready to try the TTS 100 cam with my stock headed and piston bike and am hoping for some close numbers. I was thinking of that kit but didn't want to do pistons if I didn't have to. I'm afraid that once the heads are off I won't be able to stop.
I understand STD numbers are about 3 or 4 ft/lb and hp more than SAE so just trying to compare. Here is a sheet off a stock headed and stock comp 103 with the TTS 100 using the SAE scale. Hoping for close.