Thanks for the video.....sounds real nice. Perfect!

 

Who did the dyno ?

 

Blaine at Down Home Harley Davidson in Burlington, NC.

 

Sounds great good luck with her

 

GREAT choice in cams! My build is somewhat "similar", with pretty much the same results. I went with this cam because of all the positive feedback in here. Pulls like a freight train, and I am very happy!

Andrews 57h Cams
Timken bearings
SE Adjustable pushrods
2-1-2 Headpipe
SE Chisel Extreme Billet Air Cleaner
4" Rineharts
S.E.P.S.T.

HP - 91.51
TQ - 106.72

 

If it runs good and your happy then awesome but, I think there's a little more in there. He tuned it a little lean imo. Again though, If your happy with the bike that's all that counts.

 

What makes you think it's lean? The A/F ratio of a WOT run? It's exactly where it needs to be for WOT. That graph doesn't show the 20, 40, and 60% cruising AF ratios, which is what affects driveability, gas mileage, flat spots, etc.

A dyno is a tuning tool, and no 1 dyno reads the same when looking at WOT final numbers. If I went to another dyno and it made 100hp, would it still "have more in it"?

 

Yeah, I'm not a fan of comparing dyno numbers. Pretty much, pointless.

 

This is a graph of a Fuel Moto tuned 103 with a 2/1 exhaust and Woods 555 cams, which are actually a smidgen bigger than the Andrews 57h. My graph is smoother and virtually the same exact peak numbers. And I would venture to say Fuel Moto knows how to tune a bike. So I'm pretty pleased and think it's right where it needs to be.