Compared Dyno Charts 88" to 95"
#1
02-07-2006, 12:03 AM
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Compared Dyno Charts 88" to 95"
I just got my Dyno Chart for my 95" FLHTCUI and compared it to my 88" FLTRI. My numbers for my '04 FLHTCUI with the 95"/SE Breather/SE SERT/Thunderheaders are (79.06/86.90). My numbers for my '05 FLTRI with the 88"/SE Breather/SE SERT/V&H ProPipe II are (77.09/79.46). The numbers that I'm getting with the FLHTCUI don't seem to be what I'm feeling. The FLHTCUI definitely feels stronger and pulls longer. The same dealer was responsible for both bikes. I don’t know if the same Tech worked on both bikes. I’m curious why the FLHTCUI’s Dyno Chart did not include the test conditions like temperature and humidity. I welcome comments and/or responses.
[IMG]local://upfiles/296/B785C04C6F364E5588FF8810C35E4D64.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/296/FEED01E6A5C04EE6B7D87C6EC62F13FE.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/296/B785C04C6F364E5588FF8810C35E4D64.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/296/FEED01E6A5C04EE6B7D87C6EC62F13FE.jpg[/IMG]
#2
02-07-2006, 12:08 AM
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 3,985
Received 6,814 Likes
on
1,088 Posts
#4
02-07-2006, 02:18 AM
Tourer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Compared Dyno Charts 88" to 95"
After reading many posts containing dyno results I feel that I must have an above average engine. It is a 06 FLHT carbed, Rinehart True Duals (new style), a Doherty Power PACC air cleaned, and the standard DynoJet kit. I used the needle, emulsion tube, and the jet from the kit along with a 48 slow jet. I did not use their spring and did not drill the slide. The last time it was on the dyno it made 79.37 hp / 86.06 tq. and that is with an A/F of 12:1 to 12.5:1 which is on the rich side. The engine only has 1500 miles on the clock and other than the mods mentioned it is stock.
#7
02-07-2006, 11:41 AM
Tourer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Prior Lake, MN
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
02-07-2006, 06:28 PM
Outstanding HDF Member
RE: Compared Dyno Charts 88" to 95"
ORIGINAL: gsparesa
I just got my Dyno Chart for my 95" FLHTCUI and compared it to my 88" FLTRI. My numbers for my '04 FLHTCUI with the 95"/SE Breather/SE SERT/Thunderheaders are (79.06/86.90). My numbers for my '05 FLTRI with the 88"/SE Breather/SE SERT/V&H ProPipe II are (77.09/79.46). The numbers that I'm getting with the FLHTCUI don't seem to be what I'm feeling. The FLHTCUI definitely feels stronger and pulls longer. The same dealer was responsible for both bikes. I don’t know if the same Tech worked on both bikes. I’m curious why the FLHTCUI’s Dyno Chart did not include the test conditions like temperature and humidity. I welcome comments and/or responses.
[IMG]local://upfiles/296/B785C04C6F364E5588FF8810C35E4D64.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/296/FEED01E6A5C04EE6B7D87C6EC62F13FE.jpg[/IMG]
I just got my Dyno Chart for my 95" FLHTCUI and compared it to my 88" FLTRI. My numbers for my '04 FLHTCUI with the 95"/SE Breather/SE SERT/Thunderheaders are (79.06/86.90). My numbers for my '05 FLTRI with the 88"/SE Breather/SE SERT/V&H ProPipe II are (77.09/79.46). The numbers that I'm getting with the FLHTCUI don't seem to be what I'm feeling. The FLHTCUI definitely feels stronger and pulls longer. The same dealer was responsible for both bikes. I don’t know if the same Tech worked on both bikes. I’m curious why the FLHTCUI’s Dyno Chart did not include the test conditions like temperature and humidity. I welcome comments and/or responses.
[IMG]local://upfiles/296/B785C04C6F364E5588FF8810C35E4D64.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/296/FEED01E6A5C04EE6B7D87C6EC62F13FE.jpg[/IMG]
What are you say? Are you saying the 95" feels like it has more get up then the 88" or the other way around?
If I'm reading this right your saying the 95" bike has about 7 more lbs of TQ and about 2 more HP, right? If so, it should feel stronger and pull longer, right?
#9
02-07-2006, 06:30 PM
#10
02-07-2006, 06:36 PM
Outstanding HDF Member
RE: Compared Dyno Charts 88" to 95"
ORIGINAL: Electra Geezer
After reading many posts containing dyno results I feel that I must have an above average engine. It is a 06 FLHT carbed, Rinehart True Duals (new style), a Doherty Power PACC air cleaned, and the standard DynoJet kit. I used the needle, emulsion tube, and the jet from the kit along with a 48 slow jet. I did not use their spring and did not drill the slide. The last time it was on the dyno it made 79.37 hp / 86.06 tq. and that is with an A/F of 12:1 to 12.5:1 which is on the rich side. The engine only has 1500 miles on the clock and other than the mods mentioned it is stock.
After reading many posts containing dyno results I feel that I must have an above average engine. It is a 06 FLHT carbed, Rinehart True Duals (new style), a Doherty Power PACC air cleaned, and the standard DynoJet kit. I used the needle, emulsion tube, and the jet from the kit along with a 48 slow jet. I did not use their spring and did not drill the slide. The last time it was on the dyno it made 79.37 hp / 86.06 tq. and that is with an A/F of 12:1 to 12.5:1 which is on the rich side. The engine only has 1500 miles on the clock and other than the mods mentioned it is stock.
Electra Geezer
Sounds like your bike is above average. You have some very good numbers. I'll bet it has alot to do with the Doherty power pacc breather kit.
What RPM rang are you at ? Are those Peak #'s