Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Headquarters TC-500-HC vs Harley SE-204 cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-07-2009, 06:21 PM
jag1886's Avatar
jag1886
jag1886 is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Here's a dyno chart from my bike, it's not a 103 it's still a 96, with the HQ500 and a FatCat and a Big Sucker.
It really woke mine up.
 
Attached Thumbnails Headquarters TC-500-HC vs Harley SE-204 cams?-copy-of-dsc02572.jpg  

Last edited by jag1886; 03-07-2009 at 06:25 PM.
  #12  
Old 03-07-2009, 08:30 PM
XTrooper3936's Avatar
XTrooper3936
XTrooper3936 is offline
Road Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Retired and living in the mountains of NE PA
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I like that torque line! Thanks for posting the graph, JAG!
 
  #13  
Old 03-07-2009, 08:44 PM
Lonewolf176's Avatar
Lonewolf176
Lonewolf176 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver Island B.C.
Posts: 1,896
Received 269 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jag1886
Here's a dyno chart from my bike, it's not a 103 it's still a 96, with the HQ500 and a FatCat and a Big Sucker.
It really woke mine up.
+1 on the HQ cams. There is a lot more to a good cam than just lift and duration.
 
  #14  
Old 03-07-2009, 10:26 PM
103Lee's Avatar
103Lee
103Lee is offline
Intermediate
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by XTrooper3936
Mike's advice might be great, but I haven't paid for posting a question to date and I'm not about to start now. I'm never going to pay to listen to the radio either (XM et al), but that's just me.

Comments regarding personal experiences with one of these two cams would be helpful.
I rode a 2009 FLHX w/103" and SE204 cams. All I can say is WOW. You dip into a third gear sweeper and whack the throttle open and you're flat trackin'. It accelerates hard enough (below 4000 RPM) that I would be happy to ride it anytime. I've only ridden a few thousand bikes , and most were only 120+ HP imports , but that Street Glide was an amazing ride. Just plain fun. No work or effort-the throttle was a rheostat. We just built a Sporty that put 75 ft/lbs down at the wheel-550 lbs. wet. That FLHX will stomp it. With slip-on mufflers. I'm a believer in the 204s.
 
  #15  
Old 03-07-2009, 10:38 PM
09StreetGlider's Avatar
09StreetGlider
09StreetGlider is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bagram, Afghanistan
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 103Lee
I rode a 2009 FLHX w/103" and SE204 cams. All I can say is WOW. You dip into a third gear sweeper and whack the throttle open and you're flat trackin'. It accelerates hard enough (below 4000 RPM) that I would be happy to ride it anytime. I've only ridden a few thousand bikes , and most were only 120+ HP imports , but that Street Glide was an amazing ride. Just plain fun. No work or effort-the throttle was a rheostat. We just built a Sporty that put 75 ft/lbs down at the wheel-550 lbs. wet. That FLHX will stomp it. With slip-on mufflers. I'm a believer in the 204s.
Any head work done to this build? Domed or Flat Top Pistons? Anything else done?
 
  #16  
Old 03-08-2009, 07:15 AM
XTrooper3936's Avatar
XTrooper3936
XTrooper3936 is offline
Road Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Retired and living in the mountains of NE PA
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by 103Lee
I rode a 2009 FLHX w/103" and SE204 cams. All I can say is WOW. You dip into a third gear sweeper and whack the throttle open and you're flat trackin'. It accelerates hard enough (below 4000 RPM) that I would be happy to ride it anytime. I've only ridden a few thousand bikes , and most were only 120+ HP imports , but that Street Glide was an amazing ride. Just plain fun. No work or effort-the throttle was a rheostat. We just built a Sporty that put 75 ft/lbs down at the wheel-550 lbs. wet. That FLHX will stomp it. With slip-on mufflers. I'm a believer in the 204s.
Thanks a lot for your comments, Lee. They're very helpful.
 
  #17  
Old 03-08-2009, 09:46 AM
Dr. Combustion's Avatar
Dr. Combustion
Dr. Combustion is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

103Lee rode my bike on Saturday. No head work; flat top pistons; mods are in my signature.
 
  #18  
Old 03-08-2009, 10:45 AM
PhilM's Avatar
PhilM
PhilM is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 5,939
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Steve,

Did you talk to Kevin late this week, or earlier? The new 525 was only released mid week.

I would check with him again and ask about the 525 as well. If you clearly explain what you're after, he will guide you in the right direction.

DO NOT get caught up in comparing dyno sheets. They ARE NOT always representative of how a bike will actually "ride". What happens at 100% WFO may or may NOT be indicative of how it behaves under normal (99+% of the time) riding conditions.

FWIW, I would be leaning towards the 500 or 525.

I have installed many 500's and they make for an excellent "ride". I ha not had the 525 yet, but am anxiously waiting.
 
  #19  
Old 03-08-2009, 11:23 AM
XTrooper3936's Avatar
XTrooper3936
XTrooper3936 is offline
Road Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Retired and living in the mountains of NE PA
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Hi, Phil. Actually, Kevin got back to me on Friday and, based on what I'm looking for, he recommended the 500. I looked at the specs of the 525 and think for my style of riding, with a loaded down, 2-up bike, the 500 would be a better choice for me among the HQ cams.

FWIW, I'm an old drag racer and I've built many street/race auto motors, so I know a bit about engines, cams, and what works for which application. I also know that dynos are a valuable yet imperfect tool and, like we always used to say, "you don't win races on the dyno" so I also know you're right when you say peak WOT numbers aren't everything and, in my case, aren't very important at all.
 

Last edited by XTrooper3936; 03-08-2009 at 11:25 AM.
  #20  
Old 03-08-2009, 11:28 AM
XTrooper3936's Avatar
XTrooper3936
XTrooper3936 is offline
Road Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Retired and living in the mountains of NE PA
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Something I failed to ask earlier is, how do these two cams idle? Smooth, choppy, rough? Your impressions would be much appreciated. I see the 500 has 39 degrees of overlap which I'm sure wouldn't be a problem, especially in a big bore motor, but I'd like to hear from someone regarding how it idles. Thanks!
 

Last edited by XTrooper3936; 03-08-2009 at 11:31 AM.


Quick Reply: Headquarters TC-500-HC vs Harley SE-204 cams?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.