Touring 103 CAMS
#13
I'm familiar with Fuel Moto's 555 wood cams, but not the SE-204 cams. Got a link? Also, can you tell me more about how/why the 204 cams keeps you in warranty? I really thought that getting in the engine voided the factory HD warranty.
#14
Well as far as the warranty, I simply installing Harley Davidson parts, which they sell, and installed by an approved licensed shop. As far as the part number #25464-06, and link well..... https://www.hdforums.com/forum/touri...ited-dyno.html this might work, but the member boogaloodude is really on top of the cams. Send him a pm.
Hope this helps.
Hope this helps.
#16
All are great options.... so many to chose from!! LOL
I had the SE255s until I ported my heads, then had to swap cams because of ccp issues.
The SE255s were really nice, very strong all across the board, and
I didn't have any drop-off in power that some claim 'might' happen.
The new SE254 seems to be an upgrade to the 255s.
Here are the specs on the 254's
Lift @ Valve – Intake/Exhaust 535"/.536"
Duration @.053 – Intake/Exhaust 224˚/234˚
Timing @.053 Lift – Open/Close Intake: 1˚ BTDC/43˚ ABDC
Timing @.053 Lift – Open/Close Exhaust: 50˚ BBDC/4˚ ATDC
TDC Lift @ Valve – Intake/Exhaust 0.094"/.102"
The Andrews 54H performs very well and is about $100 cheaper than the T-555 from Wood, and comparable. (See HTT forum.)
Also, the Andrews 48H looks promising too.
So now you have your answer; you just have to pick one!!
I had the SE255s until I ported my heads, then had to swap cams because of ccp issues.
The SE255s were really nice, very strong all across the board, and
I didn't have any drop-off in power that some claim 'might' happen.
The new SE254 seems to be an upgrade to the 255s.
Here are the specs on the 254's
Lift @ Valve – Intake/Exhaust 535"/.536"
Duration @.053 – Intake/Exhaust 224˚/234˚
Timing @.053 Lift – Open/Close Intake: 1˚ BTDC/43˚ ABDC
Timing @.053 Lift – Open/Close Exhaust: 50˚ BBDC/4˚ ATDC
TDC Lift @ Valve – Intake/Exhaust 0.094"/.102"
The Andrews 54H performs very well and is about $100 cheaper than the T-555 from Wood, and comparable. (See HTT forum.)
Also, the Andrews 48H looks promising too.
So now you have your answer; you just have to pick one!!
#17
#19
#20
I have a 103" and ran the andrews 50s last summer they are great at mid to upper rpms but lack in low end torque.I just installed the andrews 26s because we do alot of back roads and mountain twisties. the 26s come to life alot sooner.Havent had a chance to run them yet since its snowing here but she sounds strong idling.