Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gear cams Vs Chain driven

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:24 PM
FL-kruzen's Avatar
FL-kruzen
FL-kruzen is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,128
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Question Gear cams Vs Chain driven

I see many post about gear cams in place of chain driven cams. Is this change out something you would have the dealer do or can you do it yourself? What would be the cost? Would it be a good idea to upgrade the cams too?
 
  #2  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:44 PM
buggy's Avatar
buggy
buggy is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 644
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

With the chain you will have lag as the chain stretches and the tensioners will wear. Gear drive no stretch or tensioners, more reliable and quicker to get the power going . I ad an 88" with s&s 510 gear drives and loved it, about a grand installed at a dealer, to buy the tools and do it yourself was about the same money. Will you use the tools again is a question to ask yourself.
 
  #3  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:59 PM
mkguitar's Avatar
mkguitar
mkguitar is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Phoenix '53, '88, '09 Big Twins
Posts: 14,746
Received 393 Likes on 335 Posts
Default

The only draw backs to the gear drive are...noise and cost.

More precise valve timing and the correct performance upgrade for a weak system such as used in the twin cams the first 6 or 7 years of manufacture.

My 09 is near stock, I doubt I'll be needing to change the cam drive system anytime soon.

Noise emissions are one of the reasons that H-D didn't use them, sure would have saved them some headaches.
The old generator motors sure have a lot of gear whine from the right side

Mike
 

Last edited by mkguitar; 12-01-2011 at 08:04 PM.
  #4  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:06 PM
oldbagr's Avatar
oldbagr
oldbagr is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Noise problem is grossly overstated; put gear driven cams in my '09 Ultra when I did the 103" build and no one ever mentioned cam noise or asked if I had gear driven cams. If I were replacing cams again, I would chose gear driven cams. Only problem is that they cost a little more initially.
 
  #5  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:10 PM
Bill03E's Avatar
Bill03E
Bill03E is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,403
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The question of the hour is what bike you are talking about, if it is an 07, or newer there is no need to worry about what you have.
If you have an 07, or older I would go with the hydro SE setup , because the crank wheels shift, and would eat gears , but not so much with the chain setup.
 
  #6  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:23 PM
bigdumbnoitall00's Avatar
bigdumbnoitall00
bigdumbnoitall00 is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,342
Received 632 Likes on 504 Posts
Default

a properly tolerance gear drive will be quiet,but it takes time to mesaure the lash and reorder bigger or smaller gears,so most dont take the time to do it.crank runout(the amount of wobble on the end of the crank) is ussaly or may become to much for gear drives on the 07 and newer bikes,unless u plugg trua and weld the crank.on the 02 gears are great as 02 has a very good crank.03 -06 check the runpout if its in your good for gears if not the newer style hydolic tentioners are the way to go.
 
  #7  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:24 PM
sedouglas's Avatar
sedouglas
sedouglas is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 140
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill03E
The question of the hour is what bike you are talking about, if it is an 07, or newer there is no need to worry about what you have.
If you have an 07, or older I would go with the hydro SE setup , because the crank wheels shift, and would eat gears , but not so much with the chain setup.
So does the '07 go either way? I happen to have one and was wondering if it is needed.
 
  #8  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:52 PM
Bill03E's Avatar
Bill03E
Bill03E is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,403
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

As far as I know, all of the 07s have hydro tensioners.
I didn't type the right thing in my earlier post, it should be 06, and older to 1999.
 
  #9  
Old 12-01-2011, 10:02 PM
El Rey's Avatar
El Rey
El Rey is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have gear drive and in all my Youtube videos, you don't hear any gear noise. I barely hear it, and that's only at stop lights.
 
  #10  
Old 12-01-2011, 11:12 PM
speakerfritz's Avatar
speakerfritz
speakerfritz is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

if you didn't send you crank out for trueing, plug, and weld....I would stay with the chain drive. for gear drive you need an almost perfect crank run out and quite frankly it is highly unlikely you have that.
 


Quick Reply: Gear cams Vs Chain driven



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.