Been lookiing at cams and thought I had decided on the TW-6-6 for my 11 Street Glide. Now I'm thinking about the TW-222. Any real world feed back on how the two compare riding? The bike has Fuel moto Jackpots, de-catted, stage 1 air cleaner, and PC-V.

 

Subscribed - looking for TW-222 feedback myself

 

Subscribed!

Curious too, I am going to have my Indy install ASAP. However, if some riders already have these in, would like to hear what they think. The FM dyno sheets
Show good #'s for torque and not too shabby HP, a better cam then the SE 255 I have now

 

The TW6-6 and TW-222 are pretty different cams. The 6-6 has been pretty well superceded with TW-555 which makes better low end and mid range than the 6-6 and it still pulls good thru the upper RPM's. The TW-555 is an awesome all round cam for sure. The new TW-222 is what we consider a "short" cam which we helped Bobby design specifically for low compression motors with an emphasis specifically on low end torque, it really shines in this area. The 222 makes slightly better very low RPM power than the 555, while the 555 makes better top end power. Both cams work great, it really comes down to your riding style and the rest of your combination.

 

FYI, we will have the TW-222 cams and start filling orders later this week.

 

So with the Jackpot 2-1-2 headers, Jackpot Exhaust, SE air cleaner, and Power Vision - what do you recommend?

Also, if one were to eventually move to the 107 kit, how does the TW-222 work with that?

 

Both cams would work very well, if you are looking to possibly upgrade to the 107" kit the TW-555 may be best suited for your build

 

Jamie I saw dyno sheets in your site but I didnt see one for the 222 with a 96 cu . have u tried it in a 96 or is that a no go mix

 

TW-222 is an excellent fit for the 96" motor, we just have not had a chance to test one yet.

 

my friend has a 96 I sent him web page of the testing u have done so far but didnt see 96 now i know why