My review of my new SE 204 cams
#21
11-22-2012, 07:23 PM
Cruiser
#22
11-22-2012, 08:34 PM
I did a clip today on my camcorder, I have a before and after, it sounds bad *** now, I did not think it would make that much of a difference, the SE 204 cam is a great cam for sound and performance, was out riding today and did not want to come home, ear to ear smile.
As far as the Woods 222 cam, it has less duration and overlap so it will not sound as good as the SE 204
As far as the Woods 222 cam, it has less duration and overlap so it will not sound as good as the SE 204
Last edited by fwb35; 11-23-2012 at 06:20 AM.
#23
11-22-2012, 08:45 PM
Cruiser
I did a clip toay on my camcorder, I have a before and after, it sounds bad *** now, I did not think it would make that much of a difference, the SE 204 cam is a great cam for sound and performance, was out riding today and did not want to come home, ear to ear smile.
As far as the Woods 222 cam, it has less duration and overlap so it will not sound as good as the SE 204
As far as the Woods 222 cam, it has less duration and overlap so it will not sound as good as the SE 204
Can't wait to see the video, thanx
#24
11-22-2012, 10:34 PM
Grand HDF Member
Will some good headwork and a bump in comp help the top-end pull? Is it possible they are dropping off so quickly because they are running out of air.
Anyone got dyno sheets of the SE204 in a full 95 build with good heads? Im buying a bike with a 10.25:1 95 build with SE211 cams and think im going to be looking for a different cam and would be interested in seeing the results.
Anyone got dyno sheets of the SE204 in a full 95 build with good heads? Im buying a bike with a 10.25:1 95 build with SE211 cams and think im going to be looking for a different cam and would be interested in seeing the results.
#25
11-23-2012, 01:46 AM
#26
11-23-2012, 05:55 AM
Grand HDF Member
#27
11-23-2012, 06:03 AM
Seasoned HDF Member
#28
11-23-2012, 06:04 AM
Seasoned HDF Member
