Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone have the S&S 510c cams in their bagger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-27-2013, 10:06 PM
yzernie's Avatar
yzernie
yzernie is offline
Road Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SoCal/Show Low, Az
Posts: 508
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default Anyone have the S&S 510c cams in their bagger?...UPDATE in Post #19

***After mod update in post #19***

Been looking to add some cams to my 11 RGU and like the dyno of the S&S 510c cams. Mods I already have are the SE Stage 1 intake, Vance & Hines Power Dual head pipes mated to Rinehart 4" muffs and a HD Stage 1 upgrade.

If you have the S&S 510c's, please give me your opinions.

Thanks in advance.
 

Last edited by yzernie; 05-05-2013 at 06:05 PM. Reason: Updated, post #19
  #2  
Old 03-28-2013, 04:04 AM
glide2005's Avatar
glide2005
glide2005 is offline
Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Shenandoah, TX
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I had the SS 510g in my 05 EGC and loved them. Great tq and hp with these cams. The volume level on the exhaust goes up quite a bit. I went from a 88" to a 98" and 67hp to 100 hp and 70lb tq to 112lb tq. These cams work best as in all cams I guess with some head work also.
 
  #3  
Old 03-28-2013, 12:19 PM
Snowmaster113's Avatar
Snowmaster113
Snowmaster113 is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Put the 510s in my 99 RK and only able to ride a few times cause of the snow around here. But a huge improvement from the stock ones. Can't wait to ride it for more than 5 miles.
 
  #4  
Old 03-28-2013, 12:25 PM
pit1600's Avatar
pit1600
pit1600 is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: near Paris, France
Posts: 2,371
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

My buddy and i put them in our rides, works well but better around 3000 and up. A nice idle sound too!!
 
  #5  
Old 03-28-2013, 06:06 PM
lowrider56's Avatar
lowrider56
lowrider56 is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Washington, Ohio
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had them installed on my 99 flht when we did the big bore kit. Initially there was a little whine to them but that has settled down. My wife and I do a lot of traveling and the cams have made a noticeable difference in our riding with the added torque. I'm happy with them and would recommend them.
 
  #6  
Old 03-28-2013, 06:36 PM
Frogprince's Avatar
Frogprince
Frogprince is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ketchikan Alaska
Posts: 637
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

I have the 510G cams in my 99 Ultra Classic. The 510 I would classify more of a highway cam since it kicks in at 2600 rpms. More aimed when you are cruising down a road and may need the kick in that range.

There is a 509 cam that is for more all around preformance. It kicks in at a lower rpm range.


When doing cams you have to ask first what kind of riding I do and where is it at. Then you can look into a cam that fits that mold. Some are great for tire burning tourqe and others are aimed for a better kick at passing.

Talk to a good shop about the cams. Mine recommended the 510s since 90% of what I do is highway.
 
  #7  
Old 03-28-2013, 06:41 PM
bagman1's Avatar
bagman1
bagman1 is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,997
Received 51 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

I have them in my 103 and am happy going on 35k miles now.
 
  #8  
Old 03-28-2013, 07:06 PM
WIHD55's Avatar
WIHD55
WIHD55 is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Do you have the 96 or the 103?

103 I would recommend the 551 over the 510. 510 if you have the 96.

Right from S&S:

510: Designed as a bolt-in cam for 88, 95, and 96 CID engines with compression ratios below 9.7:1, it is primarily intended for use with stock, un-ported heads. 3000-5500 rpm.


551: Designed for engines with 96 to 106 CID and 9:1 to 9:9 compression this is a bolt-in cam set designed for stock or mildly modified touring bikes. 551 cams are not recommended for compression ratios of 10:1 or greater. Greatly improves low-end and midrange torque, strongest from idle-4000rpm
 
  #9  
Old 03-28-2013, 07:10 PM
bagman1's Avatar
bagman1
bagman1 is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,997
Received 51 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WIHD55
Do you have the 96 or the 103?

103 I would recommend the 551 over the 510. 510 if you have the 96.

Right from S&S:

510: Designed as a bolt-in cam for 88, 95, and 96 CID engines with compression ratios below 9.7:1, it is primarily intended for use with stock, un-ported heads. 3000-5500 rpm.


551: Designed for engines with 96 to 106 CID and 9:1 to 9:9 compression this is a bolt-in cam set designed for stock or mildly modified touring bikes. 551 cams are not recommended for compression ratios of 10:1 or greater. Greatly improves low-end and midrange torque, strongest from idle-4000rpm
I would agree with S&S's statement except about the 510 in a 103. Mine pulls like a raped ape, if I had the 551 I would hate to run out of pulling power at 4k. My dyno sheet shows it keeps pulling up to redline and beyond.
 
  #10  
Old 03-28-2013, 07:20 PM
WIHD55's Avatar
WIHD55
WIHD55 is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Mine- hvy breather, 551, V&H 2-1-2, she holds 100 torque 2600 - 4750 on original dyno sheet. I have tweaked it some and going to redyno later this month.

But the 510 does look to be an interesting cam now that I look at the specs.

Damn, the spec sheet doesn't post right.

http://www.sscycle.com/feature/featureview.php?s_id=52
 


Quick Reply: Anyone have the S&S 510c cams in their bagger?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.