to cam or not to cam
#11
#12
A lot of talk and discussions on cams and which one is correct for the power you are trying to achieve. After much research and reading here on this blog I have come to this conclusion; If you want more power at certain times......down shift. The results are the same.
Last edited by Terrabella; 04-22-2014 at 04:14 PM.
#13
#14
A lot of talk and discussions on cams and which one is correct for the power you are trying to achieve. After much research and reading here on this blog I have come to this conclusion; If you want more power at certain times......down shift. The results are the same.
#15
#16
I do see what people are saying about the 204's they come on just a little later in RPM but then come on harder and fall off about the same as the 255's hmmm...
Last edited by bikerbehaviorist; 04-22-2014 at 07:37 PM.
#17
A lot of talk and discussions on cams and which one is correct for the power you are trying to achieve. After much research and reading here on this blog I have come to this conclusion; If you want more power at certain times......down shift. The results are the same.
#18
I jumped in to putting 255s in my bike without doing a lot of research..... I asked the dealer that did my 255s about the woods 555..... He told they "had too much lift for the stock springs and it would give me trouble down the road" ...... I laughed a couple months ago when I seen the lift of the 555 is .555" and the lift of the 255's are .556" - just sad.
#20
If your sticking with a SE cam then go with the 204's. I had them in my 2010 SG for 27,000 trouble free miles and the bike ran great. 90hp and 102tq from a 96" engine. I recently upgraded my build but the guy who bought my 204's installed them into his brothers bike and they did 89hp and 100tq. The 204 is a solid producing cam !