View Full Version : Cost of Marriage vs. Hookers


Homebrew101
05-19-2008, 07:52 AM
I did the math on the Paul McCartney-Heather Mills divorce. After 5 years of marriage, he paid her $49 million.
Assuming he banged her every night during their 5 year relationship (and being married men, we all know THAT doesn't happen), it ends up costing him $26,849 per lay, not counting attorney's fees and court costs.
On the other hand, Elliot Spitzer's call girl Kristen charges $4,000 an hour. Crazy, right?
But...
Had Paul McCartney employed Kristen for 5 years, he would've paid $7.3 million for an hour of sex every night for 5 years (a savings of $41+ million).
Value-added benefits are: a 22 year old hot babe, no begging, no coaxing, never a headache, wide open menu, to put , no bitching and complaining or 'to do' lists. Best of all,
she leaves when you're done, and comes back the next day, ready for another round. All at 1/7th the cost, with no legal fees. Is it just me, or is Kristen a WAY better deal?[/align]

Pitts2112
05-19-2008, 11:11 AM
Now that is hilarious!!

lionsm13
05-19-2008, 11:23 AM
Great points!!!!!:)

connsmith
05-19-2008, 12:08 PM
Yeah but would she have been a one legged hooker:D

*NIGHT TRAIN*
05-19-2008, 03:34 PM
The same "trickle down" theory would work for the average married man...just stay single cause it's just cheaper and less headache to contract some work out...[sm=laughingsmilie.gif]...and you know what they say...if you want bricks "laid" right, hire a brick "layer"...:D

Hedog
05-19-2008, 03:41 PM
If it has tits, it's trouble.............

JERRYG17
05-22-2008, 03:01 PM
never thought of it that way