Harley Davidson Forums
Harley Davidson Forums - Harley Davidson Classifieds - HDForums.com Photo Galleries - Create an Account - Harley Davidson News

Go Back   Harley Davidson Forums > Harley Davidson Motorcycles > Screamin Eagle CVO Models




Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-23-2008, 07:21 PM
woodeyewetzel woodeyewetzel is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 221
Default 110

What can I do to increase HP on my 110 besides pipes and mapp
__________________
While alive-live.....
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on HD Forums!
  #2  
Old 06-24-2008, 01:27 PM
sonic's Avatar
sonic sonic is offline
Senior Rider
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 415
Default RE: 110

Cams will certainly help but it will compromise your warranty. Not worth it for me. Good luck though. Keep us posted
__________________
http://www.hdforums.com/forum/image.php?u=60837&type=sigpic&dateline=1218746778
2008 FXDSE-2
I'm going to be a happy idiot and struggle for the legal tender...Jackson Browne
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-24-2008, 11:03 PM
dope_man_21's Avatar
dope_man_21 dope_man_21 is offline
Road Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Carrollton, Georgia
Posts: 1,203
Default RE: 110

I went with the standard upgrades, I installed Cobra Speedster pipes, the K&amp\\;N Heavy Breather, and the Cobra FI2000R fuel processor, I don't know what kind of numbers you are looking for but mine is producing about 104 rear wheel horse power and 117 foot pounds of torque, I don't remember the exact number at the exact rpm, but I did post it on here when I got the dyno print out.

[IMG]local://upfiles/47348/E21713809DE24B439D3EBB3708EFFA6F.jpg[/IMG]
__________________


Patriot Guard Rider
Freedom isn't Free
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2008, 03:32 AM
GBeck's Avatar
GBeck GBeck is offline
Hang Around
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wiesdaben, Germany
Posts: 75
Default RE: 110

Yeah, me too. Went with the standard More Air/Freer Exhaust & Power Commander to get as much out of the bike without cracking the case. I'm happy not knowing the power difference. It runs great, less heat, head turning growl and a bit more power. S&S does make a dual bore intake which may fit the 50mm intake body and would make it a bit different then the rest of us with Heavy Breathers or Force Winders installed. Enjoy your ride!

[IMG]local://upfiles/50983/006A300886DD40E8B22CF92C31A9F457.jpg[/IMG]
__________________
G Beck

'08 SE Dyna, PCIII, Samson Legend Baloney Cuts, SE Heavy Breather, 2" tank lift, LePera Barebones Tribal
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-25-2008, 11:57 PM
arealinvestor arealinvestor is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11
Default RE: 110

Quote:
ORIGINAL: dope_man_21

I went with the standard upgrades, I installed Cobra Speedster pipes, the K&amp\\;\\\\\\;N Heavy Breather, and the Cobra FI2000R fuel processor, I don't know what kind of numbers you are looking for but mine is producing about 104 rear wheel horse power and 117 foot pounds of torque, I don't remember the exact number at the exact rpm, but I did post it on here when I got the dyno print out.

[IMG]local://upfiles/47348/E21713809DE24B439D3EBB3708EFFA6F.jpg[/IMG]
&nbsp\\;
&nbsp\\;
Wow thats not alot.I would expect more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Craig G
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2008, 10:34 AM
madurodave madurodave is offline
Road Captain
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 516
Default RE: 110

I did the same - SEAC, Rinehart TD, SERT = 99hp/115tq. Once my warranty is up, I will go with cams, port/polish on heads.
__________________
Maduro

2007 FLHRC
110 SE Engine
SERT
SE Air Cleaner
Rinehart TD exhaust with O2 sensors
99 hp, 115 tq
Tour trunk
Touring saddle

1957 FLH
All original
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2008, 11:24 AM
seultra seultra is offline
Hang Around
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 18
Default RE: 110

"Wow thats not alot.I would expect more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
&nbsp\\;
&nbsp\\;
Not really&nbsp\\;. . . That's way toooooo much for only those mods! (breather, mufflers &amp\\; fuel processor)
117TQ &amp\\; 104HP is unlikely without cams, headwork, cylinder work &amp\\; pistons.
__________________
pain is mandatory. . . misery is optional!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-27-2008, 11:59 AM
arealinvestor arealinvestor is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11
Default RE: 110

Quote:
ORIGINAL: seultra

"Wow thats not alot.I would expect more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
&nbsp\\;\\\\\\;
&nbsp\\;\\\\\\;
Not really&nbsp\\;\\\\\\;. . . That's way toooooo much for only those mods! (breather, mufflers &amp\\;\\\\\\; fuel processor)
117TQ &amp\\;\\\\\\; 104HP is unlikely without cams, headwork, cylinder work &amp\\;\\\\\\; pistons.
&nbsp\\;
You have SE motor right? I would think with a SE motor you would have minium 110/hp/tq?
__________________
Craig G
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-27-2008, 01:54 PM
dope_man_21's Avatar
dope_man_21 dope_man_21 is offline
Road Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Carrollton, Georgia
Posts: 1,203
Default RE: 110

I had my engine dynoed before adding any parts and it dynoed stock at 88hp, so to go to 104 thats pretty darn good. the torque was at about 96 foot pounds stock, in all a pretty good increase all of the way around

[IMG]local://upfiles/47348/9AFD659C3C6949ED9BA2F6EB48D29708.jpg[/IMG]
__________________


Patriot Guard Rider
Freedom isn't Free
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-01-2008, 02:56 PM
seultra seultra is offline
Hang Around
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 18
Default RE: 110

Quote:
ORIGINAL: arealinvestor

Quote:
ORIGINAL: seultra

"Wow thats not alot.I would expect more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
&nbsp\\;\\\\\\;\\\\\\\\\\\\\\;
&nbsp\\;\\\\\\;\\\\\\\\\\\\\\;
Not really&nbsp\\;\\\\\\;\\\\\\\\\\\\\\;. . . That's way toooooo much for only those mods! (breather, mufflers &amp\\;\\\\\\;\\\\\\\\\\\\\\; fuel processor)
117TQ &amp\\;\\\\\\;\\\\\\\\\\\\\\; 104HP is unlikely without cams, headwork, cylinder work &amp\\;\\\\\\;\\\\\\\\\\\\\\; pistons.
&nbsp\\;\\\\\\;
You have SE motor right? I would think with a SE motor you would have minium 110/hp/tq?
&nbsp\\;
Yes, This is my second CVO Ultra. I'm riding an '07 CUSE 2 with a 110".
The baseline dyno run Sept. 2006 (after break in with no mods) produced 82.35HP &amp\\; 98.75 Ft/Lbs TORQUE on a fifth gear roll-on.
Not anywhere near 110 Ft/Lbs at the rear wheel (stock config)!!!
&nbsp\\;
Considerable work and thought was put into this engine and it is now producing 104HP &amp\\; 106 Ft/Lbs TORQUE on a fifth gear roll-on
at nearly the same atmospheric conditions &amp\\;&nbsp\\;tire pressure on the same dyno with the same tuner. . . .
&nbsp\\;
__________________
pain is mandatory. . . misery is optional!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors




New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.