'02 vs. '06 Dyna WGs
#1
#3
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: On the Big Blue marble
Posts: 8,380
Received 4,369 Likes
on
2,205 Posts
#4
I also think the 02 is a better looking bike. That's a matter of taste of course, but I think the of earlier rear fender is much better looking than the 06 - 08 Wide Glide rear fender. The 06s were a bastard year, 88 motor with 6 speed tranny. Also, some of the 06s had inner primary bearing issues. I'd go with the 02 all day.
The following users liked this post:
510RICK (04-19-2016)
#5
#6
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Depends on who wants to know.........and why.
Posts: 8,688
Received 1,901 Likes
on
1,109 Posts
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Depends on who wants to know.........and why.
Posts: 8,688
Received 1,901 Likes
on
1,109 Posts
I guess time will tell how good of a bike it is. It is fun to ride, especially the more I get used to it.
#10
Thanks for the info, guys. I was leaning toward the '02 'cos I like carbs, but it's a CVO and they're asking $11K. Kinda steep to me, I'm just sitting back now and seeing if it sits for a while.
Whatever I get will be basically a bar hopper. I've got the trike for road work. The dyna might get 10K miles on it before I conk out, so high mileage issues don't really bother me, unless I find one cheap that already has the miles on it.
So many bikes, so little money...
Whatever I get will be basically a bar hopper. I've got the trike for road work. The dyna might get 10K miles on it before I conk out, so high mileage issues don't really bother me, unless I find one cheap that already has the miles on it.
So many bikes, so little money...