Got my sheet here somewhere, but 91/109 was what it ran. Bassani RR3, V&H FP3, no other mods, 90 degree day, hot motor, crap 91 California swill.
I didn't baseline it either, no point considering how many have already done it.

My next step is cams, going to throw in some S&S easy start cams, this thing does not like hot starts when it's 100 outside. Also looking for a little more power, so there's that too. At that point I think that will be enough power for the bike, and I'm going to concentrate the rest of my efforts on the suspension.

 

I think they're all probably equally accurate. They just make different assumptions about environmental conditions. SAE reads about 4% lower than STD. DIN and SAE are very close.
Here's my graph. The red line. 117 kit, stock exhaust, "tuned" with street tuner.

 

Just curious what do the lrs have for stock tb.i am guessing 50mm tbw.??

 

120" ? what's going on here? two different bikes?

 

Yep. You get a 58mm TB with the 117 kit.

 

Yes. I have no idea why the tech added that comparison. I knew they'd built an FXDLS with a 120. I'd seen the guy and his bike at the dealer. Maybe that was their best FXDLS tune so far. Don't get the 'SE SLIPONS' for mine either. Stock exhaust. The tuning file they started with listed 'SE Exhaust' as component, so maybe he was confused by that.

 

I like that all the FXDLS dynos are together. Here is mine with a 117 kit. The two curves are pre and post tune.

 

Very nice, what exhaust you running with that?

 

Thanks for sharing. Your comparison is exactly what I was wanting to see and couldn't find anywhere. I also have a 117 kit with the Se canned map. You gain 10 almost everywhere, 20 flbs at some parts of your midrange and I bet it's smoother and cooler too. I'll get around to doing the same. Thanks again

 

Excellent gains right where everyone needs it! Bravo!