Should I go for a 96 ci or get an 88 and do some engine work?
 

Got a question for you lovely folks here. I'm considering getting a dyna in the near future and I'm wanting some advice on what I should get. I'm somewhat torn between getting a bike with the 96 in it or getting an 88 for cheaper but doing some engine work to it. What do you think? I'm looking for something that's able to do some touring and also have some go to it. Which do you think is the best bet and why? Thanks!

I think you will be happy with either? My previous ride was a 03 that I installed an S&S Big Bore kit and Super E carb. Sorry, I sold that bike!

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.hdf...161e9f8303.jpg

Welcome to the formum.
I would go with the 96. I believe that's when they went to the 6 speed on the dyna, which is nice for touring, especially if you run freeways.
They also replaced the spring cam chain tensioner with a hydraulic tensioner at that time.
I believe there were a few other things they improved, like the starter system, but can't remember what that was about.
The extra stroke gave it a bit of a torque boost also. About 10 ft-lbs, I believe.
But if it's a build project you're looking for, either one works.

Go for 96. Then you get 6 speed. It took 96 to push 6th gear. Cylinders and pistons are the same. Stroke is what makes it 96.

Not truely a lot of difference.

Get a year 96 with the roller chain cam drive.

Need to be careful on the Dyna as to what year that was. The old style link chain always wears. Roller chain grooves in and then rolls. So wear stops and tensioners will last motor life or probably ever ten years shoe replacement.

They actually went to the 6 speed in 2006 and it still had the 88 in it. This is why when you look up parts it always says "Except 2006" that is a bastard year. That being said the 2007 with the 96 does have the 6 speed. The other big difference is 2007 and above have the redone cam chest. If you go with an 88 keep in mind it is one area that will need upgrading. Other then that they each have their benefits and draw backs

Just go for the 2016 or 2017 Low Rider S - it will probably cost you less in upgrades overall.
And, you'll be getting a pretty badass bike! Then again, you could go for an older FXR...

They also went to hydraulic cam chain tensioners in 06

I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong (which I could be), but I don't think these statements are accurate with regard to Dyna models. I'm pretty sure that 5th gear in a stock 88 is a 1:1 ratio, as is 6th gear in a stock 96. If there is a difference in final drive (which there may be, I'm not sure), it would come from the pulley sizes not the transmission. I do think that touring 6-Speeds had an overdriven 6th at times, as did some SE 6-Speed kits.

With regard to the OPs question, get whichever one seems to "click" with you better when you test ride it... Of course taking overall condition, history, and price into account as well. There are a number of differences which may or may not ever be apparent to you, depending what your "build" plans may be (if any), and how you ride.

Man I wish I could get one of those. Got to ride a buddy's last summer and it was unreal. Absolutely stunning bike, really want one once i have the money some day

'06 and up dynas also have the updated chassis.