Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Evo compression ratios 9.5:1 or 10.5:1

  #1  
Old 06-30-2010, 08:56 PM
dankur76's Avatar
dankur76
dankur76 is offline
Stage III
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Evo compression ratios 9.5:1 or 10.5:1

I'm just days away from building an 80" Evo.... I have the parts to build a stock engine, a 9.5:1 engine or a 10.5:1 engine. I have stock heads and "Head-Quarters" ported+milled heads. What I would like to know is what are some pro/cons of a high compression EVO?????

Hard starting?
Idle rough?
can I run 93 gas?
will it run hot?

Thanks for any info!!

P.S. it's a 93 fxdwg
 
  #2  
Old 06-30-2010, 09:18 PM
GREENOHAWK69's Avatar
GREENOHAWK69
GREENOHAWK69 is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,330
Received 555 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dankur76
I'm just days away from building an 80" Evo.... I have the parts to build a stock engine, a 9.5:1 engine or a 10.5:1 engine. I have stock heads and "Head-Quarters" ported+milled heads. What I would like to know is what are some pro/cons of a high compression EVO?????

Hard starting?
Idle rough?
can I run 93 gas?
will it run hot?

Thanks for any info!!

P.S. it's a 93 fxdwg
On my '97 WG, I have: SE Heads, Andrews EV-27 cams, SE A/C w/ Heavy Breather, HD Adjustable Pushrods, Thunderheader, previously with CV-40 carb with different Jets and I did not have a problem with - hard starting, a rough idle, Yes - I run 93 gas mostly and it did not appear to run hot. I believe compression wound being ~ 9.5:1.

I have also since did the Diamond Cutting to my Cylinders and Heads. Also have changed to a, for now, S&S A/C and a Big PSI Carb. Have not gone to the tuner yet.

Hope this helps.
 
  #3  
Old 06-30-2010, 09:34 PM
ASeg's Avatar
ASeg
ASeg is offline
Stage IV
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have 10.1 compression ratio. I installed compression releases for starting. It takes a big load off the starter. If you go with 10.5, I would recommend compression releases or a tougher starter.
 
  #4  
Old 06-30-2010, 09:52 PM
GREENOHAWK69's Avatar
GREENOHAWK69
GREENOHAWK69 is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,330
Received 555 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ASeg
I have 10.1 compression ratio. I installed compression releases for starting. It takes a big load off the starter. If you go with 10.5, I would recommend compression releases or a tougher starter.
Glad you mentioned the starter...after I had work done on the bike, they did recommend going to a bigger starter as mine was having problems.
 
  #5  
Old 06-30-2010, 09:57 PM
ASeg's Avatar
ASeg
ASeg is offline
Stage IV
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is a bear to start without the releases. It bucks something fierce if they aren't engaged.

The benefit to having higher compression is that it gives you more consistent torque through the gear. Stock EVOs stop pulling at 3500 RPM - the higher compression will get you to 6000 easily.

As an after-effect, the exhaust "pops" better - not backfire . . . more like a top fuel racer.
 
  #6  
Old 06-30-2010, 10:07 PM
fastjoe's Avatar
fastjoe
fastjoe is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baytown Tx.
Posts: 1,599
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I guess it depends on the gas in your area. I talked to a guy the other day that has a 10.5:1 Evo. He said his pings pretty bad on 93 octane, and he puts octane booster in it if he's going to run it hard. But, all the stations around here have that 10% Ethanol crap.

My Evo's 9.5:1, and I've had no issues. Maybe you could go in the middle and get some 10:1 pistons? I would probably get compression releases if you go anything over 9.5:1.
 
  #7  
Old 07-01-2010, 10:13 AM
dankur76's Avatar
dankur76
dankur76 is offline
Stage III
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the info guys, I think I'm going to shoot for the middle about 9.5:1. I believe my stock flattops with my "head-quarter" ported and milled heads with the right gaskets will land me there or somewhere near.
 
  #8  
Old 07-01-2010, 12:48 PM
paul s's Avatar
paul s
paul s is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: la
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

What cam are you running and how many cc's are your heads?
 
  #9  
Old 07-01-2010, 06:34 PM
wideglidebob's Avatar
wideglidebob
wideglidebob is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

what he said
 
  #10  
Old 07-02-2010, 09:34 AM
dankur76's Avatar
dankur76
dankur76 is offline
Stage III
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm looking at the HQ 0029 cam, and I have not cc'd the heads yet. they are stock heads milled .080"
The cam is from head-quaters.com
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Evo compression ratios 9.5:1 or 10.5:1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.