103-113": '13 FLHR 103" Andrews 57H, Big Sucker, ProPipe, SERT
#1
'13 FLHR 103" Andrews 57H, Big Sucker, ProPipe, SERT
I originally had the work done in the fall of 2015. I ran my '13 FLHR for about a month, put it away for the winter and ran it all last season. I was never very happy with the original tune so I decided to have it re-tuned by someone different this winter. I am pretty happy with with results on paper. I'll know a bit more after I ride it in a few weeks.
2013 103TC, Andrews 57H cams, Big Sucker AC, SE adj push rods, SERT, V&H Pro-Pipe.
2013 103TC, Andrews 57H cams, Big Sucker AC, SE adj push rods, SERT, V&H Pro-Pipe.
#3
#4
Not at all; the torque increase after the initial build/tune was very noticeable. I had it tuned again because I knew I could get more out of the components in my TC. My torque number went up to 107 from 100 and HP from 91 to 98. I can't find the original chart with just the stage 1 but it was noticeable.
I think your potential problem is the internal balancer not the heavy back wheel. My sense is that the extra mechanical rotating parts inside the motor have to rob some of the potential power.
I'm sure that are better qualified to comment than me.
Whatever the outcome, your Fatboy and my Roadking are set up much better than stock. I think that is what we were trying to do.
I think your potential problem is the internal balancer not the heavy back wheel. My sense is that the extra mechanical rotating parts inside the motor have to rob some of the potential power.
I'm sure that are better qualified to comment than me.
Whatever the outcome, your Fatboy and my Roadking are set up much better than stock. I think that is what we were trying to do.
Last edited by str8shuutr45; 05-03-2017 at 04:57 AM.
#5
#7
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post