i would start with a better tune. the afr graph is all over the place. a bit of head work would also make more power.

 

Yeah, I have a few things working against me on that baseline run..

1) I'm new to tuning and the current TTS tune I'm running was after my 6th V-Tune session.
2) I'm kinda in no mans land as far as my mods (epa torque cam, TTS, fullsac MX header, Rineharts)
3) The guy I went to uses PV and didn't even want to F with tuning via my TTS adapter and my laptop. Said I would only see marginal improvement due to a too free flowing exhaust and that I needed to add backpressure via more restrictive slip ons (Rineharts on the bike now) or add Thunder torque inserts to mine and retune.


I'm done spending money on mods for this year....maybe a non epa cam and a tuner that someone local uses and dyno tune next year?

Thanks dsv

 

Did Rob just do a baseline run on your tune and nothing else?

 

 

I have a hard time with the idea of changing parts based on the outcome of a single baseline dyno pull. You really don’t know what you have until the current combination has been tuned.
I’m surprised that Rob will not use a TTS— it’s superior to the PV in my humble opinion.

 

Don't know much that you could get out of this dyno sheet besides untuned bikes don't make power. As soon as peak tq is being achieved. AFR goes lean. I'd bet when he is done. The compare on the other side will be a tuned bike.