Agreed. You could go with a bigger cam and a little more headwork but at the cost of low end torque. I think your pretty much where you can be with this build.

 

I think what some are looking at for torque is a glitch on the dyno chart........otherwise that's one hell of a dip in torque.

 

Who did the original build and tune?

 

Sheldon's HD. The original tune was a SE Race factory tune that came with the kit. Had it dyno'ed because I thought there was more to be gained.

 

 

I'm a big fan of Robs Dyno as you can see in my signature.

I'll bet your engine runs great.

 

deleted

 

That engine won't put out that kind of torque at that low an rpm. I think it has do do with how the dyno was initially loaded down or something-in any case, it's an anomaly. Curve looks about like I would expect from 2000 rpm or so-pretty decent curve.

 

130/130 out of a 110" is not a hard task to accomplish, and I believe we have dyno reports of those listed on our company Facebook.
Just sent a 110" SuperGlide home to Churchville, NY....Andrews 67 cams, D&D Fatcat, 55mm HPI, our Stage IV Heads......129/133.
If in Mass., we HIGHLY reccomend Eric, at DAS, Performance in Dracut.
Polite, professional, very knowledgeable, real brick and mortar shop also.
Scott

 

It's not as much as an anomaly, it's more the characteristic of a brake type dyno instead of an inertia dyno.