Old screaming eagle camshaft info. SE-2
#1
Old screaming eagle camshaft info. SE-2
Found a N.O.S old Evo SE-2 cam kit with springs and all. Found the specs. This will be for a stock 1997 roadking fuel injected. Has slip on mufflers. Bought it on a whim.
Anyone have any experience with the old SE-2 camshaft? I was told its actually not a Bad cam.
Anyone have any experience with the old SE-2 camshaft? I was told its actually not a Bad cam.
#2
49 intake closing, 257/265 duration, 516 lift. Going to need at least 10.8-1 in a 80" to not need a pusher vehicle below 3000 rpm, if a cam needs this much compression to work, run a 590 lift and get it over with.
Modern performance street cams are working with opposite numbers, earlier intake close, shorter duration and higher lifts which allows lower power and the bigger lift can carry horsepower into higher rpm's.
Being brutally honest, a large percent of modern cams are going to work better than that one for what engine work needs done, sorry for not being the support you may have wanted but not a fan of the SE numbers
PS: bagger cams have intake closings in the 36-42 range to build compression in the lower rpm range, a 49 intake closing will be letting it out
Modern performance street cams are working with opposite numbers, earlier intake close, shorter duration and higher lifts which allows lower power and the bigger lift can carry horsepower into higher rpm's.
Being brutally honest, a large percent of modern cams are going to work better than that one for what engine work needs done, sorry for not being the support you may have wanted but not a fan of the SE numbers
PS: bagger cams have intake closings in the 36-42 range to build compression in the lower rpm range, a 49 intake closing will be letting it out
Last edited by 1997bagger; 07-05-2017 at 09:48 PM.
#3
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pine Flat Dam/South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,490
Received 19,503 Likes
on
6,631 Posts
#4
#7
Unfortunately I learned the hard way not to increase spring pressure until the lift of the cam is high enough to require it, (.550") approximately. Then a suitable lifter must be matched with them.
The following users liked this post:
cowboyshovel79 (07-08-2017)
Trending Topics
#9
i did some more research and found out this is an early kit. 25490-87 not a 25490-87A
the specs of the cam are different than the later "A" .516 lift cam
specs are
.505" lift
int-257 exh-265
int 27/55
exh 55/32
overlap 27+32
says its a bolt in for hyd. or solid tappet.
does this change anything?
the specs of the cam are different than the later "A" .516 lift cam
specs are
.505" lift
int-257 exh-265
int 27/55
exh 55/32
overlap 27+32
says its a bolt in for hyd. or solid tappet.
does this change anything?
#10
i did some more research and found out this is an early kit. 25490-87 not a 25490-87A
the specs of the cam are different than the later "A" .516 lift cam
specs are
.505" lift
int-257 exh-265
int 27/55
exh 55/32
overlap 27+32
says its a bolt in for hyd. or solid tappet.
does this change anything?
the specs of the cam are different than the later "A" .516 lift cam
specs are
.505" lift
int-257 exh-265
int 27/55
exh 55/32
overlap 27+32
says its a bolt in for hyd. or solid tappet.
does this change anything?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post