EVO All Evo Model Discussion

Comparing two FXRs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-19-2017, 03:39 PM
znicolay's Avatar
znicolay
znicolay is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Boston
Posts: 10
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Comparing two FXRs

Not sure if Classic Evo is the right place for this, but here goes. I'm looking at two FXRs.

This 1990 FXR looks really nice. One-family, two owners (father/son). 19K miles. They want $6K but it's been for sale a month+. It has lowered rear shocks and an FXRS tank, but the owner swears it's stock other than that.

The other is this bone stock 1986 FXR. Looks like a real gem. 18K miles, one owner, $4500 asking. Been for sale for almost a month.

So here's what I know and have been told:

The 1990 is a superior bike. It has 39mm forks, a better clutch, transmission, and I believe better gearing for modern highway speeds. It's also got better gaskets as HD corrected the paper gasket issue from the earlier Evo models. However, this bike is $1500 more and has been modified (however slightly). I'd want to unlower it and get mid controls on it. The front end looks like it might have been lowered, as well, but the owner swears it's stock. I'm probably mistaken on that, as I know some FXRs were made with longer/shorter forks.

The 1986 is also clean as hell with low miles. I love the mag wheels and the lower price point. I also love that it's a completely unmolested blank canvas. Ooh, and it's chain drive. However, the 35mm forks and paper gasket issue sort of bug me. More importantly, I've heard several stories of the pre-90 clutches going out due to the clutch release finger and roller bearing.

What do you folks think? And FXR experts wanna chime in? Are the bigger forks, clutch, and trans on the '90 worth the additional cost? Is the '90 as stock as the guy says it is? Am I too scared of the "issues" with the '86? Am I completely neurotic?
 
  #2  
Old 07-19-2017, 04:24 PM
texashillcountry's Avatar
texashillcountry
texashillcountry is offline
Dirt don't hurt

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Haslet Texas
Posts: 20,999
Likes: 0
Received 4,317 Likes on 1,946 Posts
Default

Picts of the bikes in question would help.
 
  #3  
Old 07-19-2017, 04:37 PM
Tommy C's Avatar
Tommy C
Tommy C is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pine Flat Dam/South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,504
Received 19,652 Likes on 6,678 Posts
Default

The 1990 has a better starter, better forks, & a belt drive. That is my choice between the two.
 
  #4  
Old 07-19-2017, 04:38 PM
flhchaz's Avatar
flhchaz
flhchaz is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: In The Woods, PA
Posts: 2,922
Received 1,285 Likes on 499 Posts
Default

^^^^^click on the blue text for pics
 
  #5  
Old 07-19-2017, 04:44 PM
0maha's Avatar
0maha
0maha is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Omaha
Posts: 6,513
Received 4,668 Likes on 1,660 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by znicolay
Not sure if Classic Evo is the right place for this, but here goes. I'm looking at two FXRs.

This 1990 FXR looks really nice. One-family, two owners (father/son). 19K miles. They want $6K but it's been for sale a month+. It has lowered rear shocks and an FXRS tank, but the owner swears it's stock other than that.

The other is this bone stock 1986 FXR. Looks like a real gem. 18K miles, one owner, $4500 asking. Been for sale for almost a month.

So here's what I know and have been told:

The 1990 is a superior bike. It has 39mm forks, a better clutch, transmission, and I believe better gearing for modern highway speeds. It's also got better gaskets as HD corrected the paper gasket issue from the earlier Evo models. However, this bike is $1500 more and has been modified (however slightly). I'd want to unlower it and get mid controls on it. The front end looks like it might have been lowered, as well, but the owner swears it's stock. I'm probably mistaken on that, as I know some FXRs were made with longer/shorter forks.

The 1986 is also clean as hell with low miles. I love the mag wheels and the lower price point. I also love that it's a completely unmolested blank canvas. Ooh, and it's chain drive. However, the 35mm forks and paper gasket issue sort of bug me. More importantly, I've heard several stories of the pre-90 clutches going out due to the clutch release finger and roller bearing.

What do you folks think? And FXR experts wanna chime in? Are the bigger forks, clutch, and trans on the '90 worth the additional cost? Is the '90 as stock as the guy says it is? Am I too scared of the "issues" with the '86? Am I completely neurotic?
Something doesn't add up there.

I'm about 99 44/100% sure that FXR's went to belt drive in 1984. The one you're looking at either isn't a 1986, or it's not as unmolested as you think.
 
  #6  
Old 07-19-2017, 05:01 PM
znicolay's Avatar
znicolay
znicolay is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Boston
Posts: 10
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by texashillcountry
Picts of the bikes in question would help.
I linked them in the original post, but here they are. The 1986 has the fairing.













 
  #7  
Old 07-19-2017, 05:05 PM
znicolay's Avatar
znicolay
znicolay is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Boston
Posts: 10
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 0maha
Something doesn't add up there.

I'm about 99 44/100% sure that FXR's went to belt drive in 1984. The one you're looking at either isn't a 1986, or it's not as unmolested as you think.
Confusing for me too. I did read here that some of the 84-85 FXRs could have chain drive. Particularly the 1985s, which makes me wonder if the seller is wrong about the year.
 

Last edited by znicolay; 07-20-2017 at 10:53 AM.
  #8  
Old 07-19-2017, 06:00 PM
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
98hotrodfatboy is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Poolville
Posts: 17,613
Received 4,808 Likes on 3,313 Posts
Default

I'd work the owner of the 90.. damn nice looking Scoot there........
 
  #9  
Old 07-20-2017, 04:12 AM
Durham man's Avatar
Durham man
Durham man is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Conn.
Posts: 2,773
Received 1,427 Likes on 909 Posts
Default

My buddy has an 85 Fxr that was belt drive but he converted it to chain. The 90 has been on ct craigslist for a while now , I remember seeing it last winter.
 
  #10  
Old 07-20-2017, 06:42 AM
Tom84FXST's Avatar
Tom84FXST
Tom84FXST is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington ,MS
Posts: 15,368
Received 18,202 Likes on 5,397 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 0maha
Something doesn't add up there.

I'm about 99 44/100% sure that FXR's went to belt drive in 1984. The one you're looking at either isn't a 1986, or it's not as unmolested as you think.




Some of the FXR models held out and used up the last of the enclosed chain drives...and people would toss the enclosure and make it just chain drive. As with most mid eighty's stuff, no real documentation...just what ever they had laying around to put on it that day.


Lot of improvements from 86 to 90...the 90 would be my first choice.
 

Last edited by Tom84FXST; 07-20-2017 at 06:46 AM.


Quick Reply: Comparing two FXRs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.