EVO All Evo Model Discussion

'89' vs '95 Electra Glide

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-16-2018, 06:47 PM
Iron.Man's Avatar
Iron.Man
Iron.Man is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 12
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default '89' vs '95 Electra Glide

Any significant differences between the '89 and '95 Electra Glides? Haven't run across any info on model year changes like I do on the newer bikes.

Thanks much
 
  #2  
Old 11-16-2018, 08:21 PM
14GuineaPig's Avatar
14GuineaPig
14GuineaPig is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,356
Received 512 Likes on 444 Posts
Default

The right side saddlebag on the earlier models (pre 1994 I think) were formed to fit around either the battery or oil tank. 1994 & up the right & left side saddlebags were similar as far as space went.
 
  #3  
Old 11-16-2018, 09:56 PM
Tee&Vee's Avatar
Tee&Vee
Tee&Vee is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,545
Received 94 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Head breather vs bottom breather. This might limit your aftermarket air cleaner options.
 
  #4  
Old 11-17-2018, 01:28 AM
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Kingglide549 is offline
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Viet Vet, crossroads
Posts: 4,576
Received 969 Likes on 694 Posts
Default

Take the bottom breather every time.
 
  #5  
Old 11-17-2018, 01:58 AM
TwiZted Biker's Avatar
TwiZted Biker
TwiZted Biker is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Niles Canyon Ca.
Posts: 64,407
Received 47,917 Likes on 17,474 Posts
Default

Lot of things changed internally in the motor, clutch and a few other places with the 92 models, parts are more common for the later years and a number of the early bugs were ironed out.
 
The following users liked this post:
Uncle Larry (11-17-2018)
  #6  
Old 11-17-2018, 10:54 AM
Iron.Man's Avatar
Iron.Man
Iron.Man is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 12
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the responses. I've found a few threads around with a little more info as well. Hope to zero in on something soon.
 
  #7  
Old 11-17-2018, 11:02 AM
Uncle Larry's Avatar
Uncle Larry
Uncle Larry is offline
Seasoned HDF Member

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southeast Michigan 15 Minutes East Of Hell
Posts: 147,601
Received 47,785 Likes on 18,560 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TwiZted Biker
Lot of things changed internally in the motor, clutch and a few other places with the 92 models, parts are more common for the later years and a number of the early bugs were ironed out.
I agree with Dan ... The more current your purchase, the more available parts are ... FWIW trying to find bag parts for the pre 1993 bags can be hard and very expensive ... Good luck on your hunt
 
  #8  
Old 11-17-2018, 02:08 PM
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Kingglide549 is offline
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Viet Vet, crossroads
Posts: 4,576
Received 969 Likes on 694 Posts
Default

If I remember correctly the early trans had some main shaft issues.
The latter mid-90s had crankcase crack issues.
This is subject to real experts jumping in here as I am drawing on some old stale memories.
 
  #9  
Old 11-17-2018, 03:32 PM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,435
Received 2,852 Likes on 2,419 Posts
Wink

With the early bags the r/h one was cut to fit around the battery, which was installed on the outside of the frame. From around '94 the oil bag was removed from the frame and integrated under the transmission casing. While the later bags look the same shape as the early ones they are actually bigger all round, in addition to no longer having the battery cutout.
 
The following users liked this post:
Kingglide549 (11-17-2018)
  #10  
Old 11-17-2018, 04:25 PM
daven9113's Avatar
daven9113
daven9113 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Grew up in Texas, moved to AZ
Posts: 915
Received 293 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Lots of differences already mentioned. I would recommend getting the newer model bike, given mileage and cost into consideration. More parts availability.
Here a few more differences to consider: splined (95) vs. keyway transmission shaft; possible case weakness in '89; '89 did not come with CV carb, it came with Keihin butterfly; '89 came with Torrington cam bearings (don't know if 95 was stock); '89 had a better stock cam (L-cam?).

Both will be great bikes. I have an 89 and like it very much.
 


Quick Reply: '89' vs '95 Electra Glide



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.