I realize these cams have just came out, but has anyone tried them yet? I'm most interested in #88110E for my 04 FLHT. I'm planning to do a big bore kit (at least 95", maybe 97") with flat top pistons and mill the heads to get the compression where I want it, port the heads, and probably do the SE hydraulic tensioner upgrade. My question is more for the experienced engine builders, how do you think the cam timing on this particular cam would compare to a Woods TW5 or 6 or to the Crane Cams 290-2? The intake opening and closing points are very close but the exhaust is quite a bit different....in your expert opinions, will that make more low end torque or less? Any and all opinions are greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Andy

 

We've pushed those numbers thru one of our engine programs here.
They look good. Nothing better, from what we see, than what already exists in the Harley performance industry.
Scott

 

You have any better cam suggestions? I ride solo, but I'm looking for more torque than anything, I'm not so hung up on big horsepower numbers. Anyway, the horsepower will come with the torque if I can get it to breathe I'm also looking for a cam with more lift, seeings how there aren't too many negatives to more lift, as long as I can keep the duration in check. That's why I'm looking at the Lunati cams, they have .561"/.569" lift