Stage 2 explanation
#1
#2
29893-07a, cams, more TQ/HP
92500003, big bore to 103" and cams, more TQ than with just cams and more HP.
Choose your poison.
#3
Hope this gives you a little insight, folks much brighter than me can chime in to correct or expand on what I've started.
Welcome to the madness!
Dave
#4
"As you change the cams you'll get some low end, mid range, or high end gains...but you'll lose a bit some where else."
Dave, I'm not disagreeing with anything you say but I think that if the stock, EPA compliant cams are replaced with a mild non-EPA cam you won't get any losses but only gains. Purely because the stock cams don't optimize anything but emissions.
Dave, I'm not disagreeing with anything you say but I think that if the stock, EPA compliant cams are replaced with a mild non-EPA cam you won't get any losses but only gains. Purely because the stock cams don't optimize anything but emissions.
#5
Gains vs. losses
What Dave was saying is that there are a lot of different cams out there, and they arenmadenwith specific purposes like gaining more torque at the low rpm range, or gaining more power at the higher rpms for more top end. There are cams for each of those purposes.
You need to think about what riding style you have, where you normally ride, etc and get a cam that will enhance that riding.
There are a lot of cams out there, so visit some of there websites and keep checking out this forum to get more info to help you decide. I know I did and still do!
And like Dave very appropriately said, "welcome to the madness", it never ends!
You need to think about what riding style you have, where you normally ride, etc and get a cam that will enhance that riding.
There are a lot of cams out there, so visit some of there websites and keep checking out this forum to get more info to help you decide. I know I did and still do!
And like Dave very appropriately said, "welcome to the madness", it never ends!
#6
Thanks Dave, welcome to the madness, huh! That was the kind of common sense explanation I was looking for. Looking at my dyno chart, I have an increase in torque and hp of approx 7 except some rpm ranges the torque goes up but the hp might be a little lower which makes looking at various cams and what they do more easily understood. We are having a very mild winter here in SE Iowa so far so I still can ride to my local dealer and get his input plus ideas from this forum.
#7
Cams will make a more noticable change than an air filter / exhaust change. Stock 96"/ stock tune arround here is good for arround 60hp/78tq. With air filter / exhaust change W/tune some may see 70hp/85tq. " Most will see a bit less" My Dyna with SE air filter, Cycle Shack slip ons and 48H cams 87.5hp/96tq. uncorrected. It makes almost 85lbs tq @ 2K rpm, over 90 before 2.5K and holds it above 90 to 5K rpms. Some make more than this in other parts of the country with a full dyno tune. I took the advice from the top builders on this site and got it right the first time. Cams are the best bang for the buck.
Billy
Billy
Last edited by Billyram; 01-29-2012 at 07:47 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
"As you change the cams you'll get some low end, mid range, or high end gains...but you'll lose a bit some where else."
Dave, I'm not disagreeing with anything you say but I think that if the stock, EPA compliant cams are replaced with a mild non-EPA cam you won't get any losses but only gains. Purely because the stock cams don't optimize anything but emissions.
Dave, I'm not disagreeing with anything you say but I think that if the stock, EPA compliant cams are replaced with a mild non-EPA cam you won't get any losses but only gains. Purely because the stock cams don't optimize anything but emissions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post