Harley Davidson Forums

Harley Davidson Forums (https://www.hdforums.com/forum/)
-   Exhaust System Topics (https://www.hdforums.com/forum/exhaust-system-topics-57/)
-   -   New Woods TW62-6 cams? (https://www.hdforums.com/forum/exhaust-system-topics/760317-new-woods-tw62-6-cams.html)

Burch753 04-27-2012 09:10 AM

New Woods TW62-6 cams?
 
So, what does everyone think about these? I had originally let Scott lead me to the TW9F-6 cams for my 124" build.... these new TW62-6 look very interesting! I would guess about the same on top but a little more mid-range? and a harder lope at idle??

Would love to hear some experienced builders thoughts on this grind!

http://www.woodcarbs.com/06-12cams.htm

Burch753 04-30-2012 08:50 AM

152 views.... bueller?

Burch753 05-01-2012 12:35 PM

I suppose even an, "I dunno" would suffice...:icon_denk:

Blk and Chrome 05-01-2012 02:59 PM

Well I'll say I think you are on the right page with that but I'm not an engine builder. It does look that way with the numbers as they are

TXCHOP 05-01-2012 04:29 PM

Wood cams tend not to lope at idle too much, a bit but not like some other cams mfg out there. What's your build and goal for the motor? I run the 68's and love them.

Hillsidecycle.com 05-01-2012 06:38 PM


Originally Posted by Burch753 (Post 9724125)
So, what does everyone think about these? I had originally let Scott lead me to the TW9F-6 cams for my 124" build.... these new TW62-6 look very interesting! I would guess about the same on top but a little more mid-range? and a harder lope at idle??

Would love to hear some experienced builders thoughts on this grind!

http://www.woodcarbs.com/06-12cams.htm


We've yet to use that cam, but the 68 will pull harder out the back.
Almost side/side power of an S&S .675.
BTW, we just shipped a modified S&S 145", to Edmonton, Alberta, with a Wood 68.
Client is installing it in a Dyna.
His "touring" bike, has one of our 124"ers in it. :D
Scott

Burch753 05-02-2012 07:26 AM


Originally Posted by BAGGERDSM (Post 9743275)
Wood cams tend not to lope at idle too much, a bit but not like some other cams mfg out there. What's your build and goal for the motor? I run the 68's and love them.

The 68 is gear driven only correct? I also think they might move things a little too far right for me on my RK. I would still like a small amount of bottom to pull through town. I realize that the woods dont have a hard lope at idle, but the thing that I like about them is the relatively close LSA per lift/duration compared to other cams. My racing backround tells me that will improve throttle response and partial throttle cruising....

My 124" build when complete:
S&S 4 5/8" flywheel welded/trued by darkhorse
S&S jugs and flat top slugs
Hillside cycle stage 4 work on stock heads... Scot has them now
HPI 58mm TBW TB with 6.2gps injectors
Woods cams.... lifters
LSR pro-stock 2-1 exhaust

Goal, I wanna bring the front end up every once in a while to scare people :) and to run with my brother-in-law's ultima....

grbrown 05-02-2012 07:50 AM


Originally Posted by Hillsidecycle.com (Post 9743831)
BTW, we just shipped a modified S&S 145", to Edmonton, Alberta, with a Wood 68.
Client is installing it in a Dyna.

Scott

Scott, rather hoping we might hear about that when it hits a dyno!

Hillsidecycle.com 05-02-2012 04:49 PM


Originally Posted by grbrown (Post 9746177)
Scott, rather hoping we might hear about that when it hits a dyno!

Graham,
Us as well!
Scott

Burch753 05-04-2012 09:06 AM

well Scott, all;

It looks like the SE266-E cam will give me a little more duration and a safer TDC overlap for clearance...? Also still have an early intake open for putting around? Would the late/short exhaust valve give a little more lope at idle?

Just exploring options... found a set at a steal.... or would the 9F still be the best bang so I'm not breaking my throttle from twisting it for more power....


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands