General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

stations/brands with the least markup on premium gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #101  
Old 10-23-2018, 12:48 AM
jcolleymx's Avatar
jcolleymx
jcolleymx is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 301
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARY DYER
I really get a giggle out of those that hyper ventilate about maybe getting a couple pints of 87 instead of 91 from a single hose pump. Up until my new TriGlide, I've been using 87 in all my Harleys, Vettes and anything else I have. Not one single fuel related problem in 59 years = NOTHING. I put approx. 12 to 15K miles a year on my TG and I ride all 12 months here in Chicago. I was once told by a mechanic years ago, if your manual says "recommends" then you can use any grade fuel, but if it says "requires" then you're better off using premium. If you want to worry about something, worry about the government OK'ing 15% ethanol in our fuel. Join the AMA and fight it Now that stuff WILL destroy your engine - according to all people that know these things. So watch out the next time you fill up - there are stations that already sell it.
1. Nobody's "hyperventilating". Just stating concerns and recommending tips, IF one wishes to know. Oh, I already said not a "couple pints", but a couple quarts. Let's see... that's TWICE as much?
2. I 've used different fuels in all my Harleys AND my Vette and they all run better on premium. Sometimes I put 89 in my Vette if not a whole tank, but never 87.
3. You were ONCE told by a mechanic YEARS ago? Well, I was once told by a socialist friend of mine that Obama was the best President ever - gee, must be true? So I'm a mechanic and I'm giving you an update - if your manual recommends premium, then I recommend you run premium. Our bikes are worth it.
4. I totally agree with you on the ethanol - that sucks!
 
  #102  
Old 10-23-2018, 08:57 AM
GARY DYER's Avatar
GARY DYER
GARY DYER is offline
Elite HDF Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WESTERN CHICAGO AREA
Posts: 4,259
Received 689 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcolleymx
1. Nobody's "hyperventilating". Just stating concerns and recommending tips, IF one wishes to know. Oh, I already said not a "couple pints", but a couple quarts. Let's see... that's TWICE as much?
2. I 've used different fuels in all my Harleys AND my Vette and they all run better on premium. Sometimes I put 89 in my Vette if not a whole tank, but never 87.
3. You were ONCE told by a mechanic YEARS ago? Well, I was once told by a socialist friend of mine that Obama was the best President ever - gee, must be true? So I'm a mechanic and I'm giving you an update - if your manual recommends premium, then I recommend you run premium. Our bikes are worth it.
4. I totally agree with you on the ethanol - that sucks!
Some one has already done research on the amount of gas left in a hose on a one hose pump. I don't remember if it was this forum or another Harley forum (maybe HTT), but it measured 2 pints NOT QUARTS!
I agree they run a little better on premium - I didn't say they didn't . I said you can run any vehicle on 87 "IF" your manual says "recommends" premium. I use premium on track days because I want the full potential then, I don't need the full power of it on normal everyday driving and since it doesn't harm the engine at all, why not?. Not only that one mechanic. He started my search and many mechanics since then have said the same thing. Also every car/motorcycle article I've read (quite a few) regarding regular vs premium fuel says the same thing = unless your manual says "requires" you can safely use regular fuel with NO PROBLEM!!!!! I have kept most of those articles so I can show people that don't or won't believe it. If you can find one person/article that says if you use regular gas in your car/bike where the manual says "premium recommended", will destroy your engine, I'd sure like to see it.
To tell you the truth, I really can't tell any difference between the two - performance wise. I don't think anyone can unless done scientifically.
If you've NEVER used 87 in your Vette, how do you know it won't be OK????????? Hmmmmmmm. That's all I used in my Vettes = 87 and never had a fuel related problem.....NEVER. But I only had a 73 Conv. and an 81 so they weren't hi=perf models. What year was/is your Vette?? I'm sure the newer Vettes do require premium.
Of course there are a few exceptions.
 

Last edited by GARY DYER; 10-23-2018 at 09:02 AM.
  #103  
Old 10-23-2018, 09:31 AM
REW13's Avatar
REW13
REW13 is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 5,629
Received 763 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buster217
Well, it's almost certainly a waste of money. Most of these products don't do anything. The only one I know of that states actual numbers for octane increase on the label is NOS. There may be others, but most just make vague claims about helping to reduce deposits that cause higher compression and pinging. In other words, most "octane boosters" only effect is to boost money from your wallet into someone's cash register.

Far as I know, nobody has ever done any studies of how long term use of these types of products affect engine life and reliability.
I've tried the octane boost in my car, first i filled it up with 93oct,then ran it out filled with 8 7 Oct and added a bottle of octane boost and the car ran the same I had more pick up when on the gas, and 2 miles more per tank, then i did 87 and I could tell the difference, especially when trying to pass a few cars on two lane roads.... So current tank is 87 plus boost and i can feel a bit more power especially in passing gear.
​​​​
 
  #104  
Old 10-23-2018, 10:23 AM
jcolleymx's Avatar
jcolleymx
jcolleymx is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 301
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARY DYER
Some one has already done research on the amount of gas left in a hose on a one hose pump. I don't remember if it was this forum or another Harley forum (maybe HTT), but it measured 2 pints NOT QUARTS!
I agree they run a little better on premium - I didn't say they didn't . I said you can run any vehicle on 87 "IF" your manual says "recommends" premium. I use premium on track days because I want the full potential then, I don't need the full power of it on normal everyday driving and since it doesn't harm the engine at all, why not?. Not only that one mechanic. He started my search and many mechanics since then have said the same thing. Also every car/motorcycle article I've read (quite a few) regarding regular vs premium fuel says the same thing = unless your manual says "requires" you can safely use regular fuel with NO PROBLEM!!!!! I have kept most of those articles so I can show people that don't or won't believe it. If you can find one person/article that says if you use regular gas in your car/bike where the manual says "premium recommended", will destroy your engine, I'd sure like to see it.
To tell you the truth, I really can't tell any difference between the two - performance wise. I don't think anyone can unless done scientifically.
If you've NEVER used 87 in your Vette, how do you know it won't be OK????????? Hmmmmmmm. That's all I used in my Vettes = 87 and never had a fuel related problem.....NEVER. But I only had a 73 Conv. and an 81 so they weren't hi=perf models. What year was/is your Vette?? I'm sure the newer Vettes do require premium.
Of course there are a few exceptions.
Ok, I should have quoted MY source - not all pumps are the same and according to a study cited by the AMA, it can be UP TO 1/2 gallon. Since I don't know which pump I'm using, I have to assume I'm getting the full 1/2 gallon so that's why I cite that amount. My Vette is a 2005 with 400 hp. The manual says to use 91 or higher, but yes, it also says you CAN use lower grades but performance will suffer. Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD. If performance is suffering then so is efficiency (and fuel economy). But I agree that on the lower performance Vettes from those older years it probably doesn't matter as the compression ratio is lower. I have three 2012 Harleys and one 2014. None of the manuals say "recommended" or "required", but they list 91 octane as a "specification". They even recommend Screaming Eagle octane booster for better performance (of course, they sell it). But anyway, I feel that "specification" qualifies as a requirement more than it does a recommendation. My problem is I rode all over southeastern Ohio the last couple of days and none of the pumps I used had 91 - they had 87, 89 and 93! But that's ok because by just pumping the 93, I figure the first half gallon is 87 and it evens out and I have a sweet sounding, purring and occasionally roaring Harley hauling me down the road. BTW, I have a new favorite road to ride and it's Rt 141 in Ohio and runs from Gallipolis to Ironton - awesome!
 

Last edited by jcolleymx; 10-23-2018 at 10:26 AM. Reason: detail
  #105  
Old 10-23-2018, 01:09 PM
dDavid's Avatar
dDavid
dDavid is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 413
Received 104 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sierra977

Go be poor somewhere else.
I don’t know why, but that line pisses me off every time.
 
The following users liked this post:
Haarley (10-24-2018)
  #106  
Old 10-24-2018, 07:11 AM
Gunrunner72's Avatar
Gunrunner72
Gunrunner72 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: LaGrange, KY
Posts: 851
Received 368 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dDavid


I don’t know why, but that line pisses me off every time.
It makes me giggle a little. If you think the snobbiness is bad on here, go over to corvetteforum.com. The ZO6/ZR1 guys really let the base model guys have it.lol
It's all in good fun.
 
  #107  
Old 10-24-2018, 08:30 AM
GARY DYER's Avatar
GARY DYER
GARY DYER is offline
Elite HDF Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WESTERN CHICAGO AREA
Posts: 4,259
Received 689 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gunrunner72
It makes me giggle a little. If you think the snobbiness is bad on here, go over to corvetteforum.com. The ZO6/ZR1 guys really let the base model guys have it.lol
It's all in good fun.
Back in the 80's when I had my Vettes, my club had 2 groups. Big Block vs small block - those were the only fighting factions. The Big Blocks sat at one table and the rest of us sat everywhere else.

Corvette clubs now, in my opinion, are strictly for the rich. In my day even factory workers could afford a Vette and we had a lot of then in our club. It started getting bad, I think, in the late 90's when Vettes were getting too expensive. I remember a few times someone in the club would say "Let's go to Bowling Green and tour the factory on Tuesday and Wednesday". Most of us couldn't because we HAD TO WORK. That's when I started going to Harley club meetings instead of Vette club meetings. Eventually I got rid of my Vettes because I was having a lot more fun with the Harley crowd.
Vette owners = 2 warring factions
Harley owners = 6+ warring factions.
As you said, most are in good fun. LOL
 
  #108  
Old 10-24-2018, 08:50 AM
Haarley's Avatar
Haarley
Haarley is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 963
Received 387 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OldEnuf2NoBtr
Ya' gotta pay to play. The markup is mostly controlled by the station's owner or Corporation and it's not as much as you think it would be. It's a supply and demand kinda' thing.
No. This isn't correct. In the Midwest, you'll see a range of 80 cents between regular and premium. In California, the range will be twenty cents, with mid grade ten cents over regular.

"Supply and demand" isn't this perfect price-establishing mechanism economists claim it is.

 
  #109  
Old 10-24-2018, 08:53 AM
Haarley's Avatar
Haarley
Haarley is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 963
Received 387 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HubBub
I can't believe this made it past the first page.

If you can't afford gas, you can't afford the bike. Period.
If you're not running VP Fuel, you don't deserve to have a Harley.
 
  #110  
Old 10-24-2018, 09:11 AM
GARY DYER's Avatar
GARY DYER
GARY DYER is offline
Elite HDF Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WESTERN CHICAGO AREA
Posts: 4,259
Received 689 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcolleymx
Ok, I should have quoted MY source - not all pumps are the same and according to a study cited by the AMA, it can be UP TO 1/2 gallon. Since I don't know which pump I'm using, I have to assume I'm getting the full 1/2 gallon so that's why I cite that amount. My Vette is a 2005 with 400 hp. The manual says to use 91 or higher, but yes, it also says you CAN use lower grades but performance will suffer. Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD. If performance is suffering then so is efficiency (and fuel economy). But I agree that on the lower performance Vettes from those older years it probably doesn't matter as the compression ratio is lower. I have three 2012 Harleys and one 2014. None of the manuals say "recommended" or "required", but they list 91 octane as a "specification". They even recommend Screaming Eagle octane booster for better performance (of course, they sell it). But anyway, I feel that "specification" qualifies as a requirement more than it does a recommendation. My problem is I rode all over southeastern Ohio the last couple of days and none of the pumps I used had 91 - they had 87, 89 and 93! But that's ok because by just pumping the 93, I figure the first half gallon is 87 and it evens out and I have a sweet sounding, purring and occasionally roaring Harley hauling me down the road. BTW, I have a new favorite road to ride and it's Rt 141 in Ohio and runs from Gallipolis to Ironton - awesome!
You're right, there are different hoses out there so I'll amend my statement = There's not enough gas left in a hose to be worried about.
I figure if you CAN do something, why not? What's the harm? Higher performance usually means less efficiency. My MPG figures were always the same, I didn't see any better mileage from either one, but since I didn't use much premium how would I know?
I don't always follow Harley's recommendations. Do you remember when they also said using synthetic oil would destroy the engine - - - until they came out with their own syn oil.

I believe the newer Harley manuals do state "requires" - at least that's what people on this forum have said and posted pics of the page stating that.

I'll stick with what the vast majority of car/bike columnists say. I hate giving our enemies any more money than I have to. Plus I get to buy a couple extra beers or a burger each month with the savings.

All I'm saying is you won't harm your engine if you use regular gas instead of premium. Not saying you have to or you should use it.
 


Quick Reply: stations/brands with the least markup on premium gas



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.