General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reliability/longevity of EVO vs. early Twin Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-21-2018, 03:48 PM
ShadowforNow's Avatar
ShadowforNow
ShadowforNow is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: CONUS
Posts: 366
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Default Reliability/longevity of EVO vs. early Twin Cam

I know there were issues with the chain and tensioner in the Twin Cam engines. Other than that, how much of a difference in reliability and longevity is there between the EVO models and the early Twin Cam models? Assume the Twin Cam models compared are carbureted. Also assume the whole vehicle, not just the engine.
 

Top Answer

 
09-22-2018, 05:54 AM
Campy Roadie's Avatar
Campy Roadie
Campy Roadie is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 11,793
Received 5,063 Likes on 2,501 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kingglide549
If you had to go between Seattle and Anchorage AK with the safest bet, it would be the EVO.
The TC depending on the year with its mechanical problems for birth defects, it also has computers that will shut it dwn.
There would be a lot of changes B4 I would be brave enough for THAT run on a TC.
On the Evo I would change out the ignition to Daytona TT and not have any worries.
How about from Ohio to the Arctic Circle, twice on a Twin Cam? Bravery is in the eye of the beholder.






 
  #2  
Old 09-21-2018, 03:56 PM
Pablo94's Avatar
Pablo94
Pablo94 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: California
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 161 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

Once dialed in, the EVO wins...
 
The following users liked this post:
tar_snake (09-22-2018)
  #3  
Old 09-21-2018, 03:56 PM
RHPAW's Avatar
RHPAW
RHPAW is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Driftless Area
Posts: 20,687
Received 13,760 Likes on 6,200 Posts
Default

Evos had issues with the INS cam bearing and base gaskets. They have likely all been fixed by now. Mine has had a Torrington bearing and James base gaskets in it for a long time now. Well over 100,000 miles and counting.

Carbs are nice because you can fix them yourself in your garage if you need to. Haven't needed to.
 
The following users liked this post:
tar_snake (09-22-2018)
  #4  
Old 09-21-2018, 04:03 PM
upflying's Avatar
upflying
upflying is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Post Falls, ID
Posts: 34,065
Received 26,172 Likes on 11,106 Posts
Default

I rode an FXRP for a few years and beat the snot out of it. Only problems was a leaking base gasket on the rear jug and a primary chain guide/tensioner letting go. Good power for only 80 cu. in. with the 49 state cam. The California cam EVO was dangerously slow.
 
  #5  
Old 09-21-2018, 04:37 PM
CndUltra95's Avatar
CndUltra95
CndUltra95 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Near YVR
Posts: 1,278
Received 54 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RHPAW
Evos had issues with the INS cam bearing and base gaskets. They have likely all been fixed by now. Mine has had a Torrington bearing and James base gaskets in it for a long time now. Well over 100,000 miles and counting.

Carbs are nice because you can fix them yourself in your garage if you need to. Haven't needed to.
There where even porous cases during the mid to early nineties .
Oil would seep through the cases and was found with a die and ultra violet light to locate the seepage.
All being equal they are reliable machines that if treated like a machine and not beaten they can and do run for many miles with basic repairs.
Rob
 
The following 2 users liked this post by CndUltra95:
Campy Roadie (09-22-2018), tar_snake (09-22-2018)
  #6  
Old 09-21-2018, 05:26 PM
Uncle G.'s Avatar
Uncle G.
Uncle G. is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 9,187
Received 3,704 Likes on 1,989 Posts
Default

Still riding my Evo FLSTN daily at 222,000 miles. Only weakness I had was the early design tappet rollers which cost me my first engine. 131,000 miles on the current H-D remanufactured engine. No oil leaks, no oil burning, good compression, runs great.
 
The following 4 users liked this post by Uncle G.:
Advocatus Diaboli (10-20-2018), nick@nite (10-18-2018), Sarah93003 (09-22-2018), tar_snake (09-22-2018)
  #7  
Old 09-21-2018, 10:07 PM
bikerlaw's Avatar
bikerlaw
bikerlaw is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 9,193
Received 485 Likes on 353 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle G.
Still riding my Evo FLSTN daily at 222,000 miles.
Show off!
 
The following 2 users liked this post by bikerlaw:
Halojumper (10-04-2018), Sarah93003 (09-22-2018)
  #8  
Old 09-21-2018, 10:09 PM
NORTY FLATZ's Avatar
NORTY FLATZ
NORTY FLATZ is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sandy Eggo's North County
Posts: 14,592
Received 5,387 Likes on 2,951 Posts
Default

Yup, EVO.
 
The following users liked this post:
tar_snake (09-22-2018)
  #9  
Old 09-22-2018, 04:46 AM
Campy Roadie's Avatar
Campy Roadie
Campy Roadie is offline
Seasoned HDF Member

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 11,793
Received 5,063 Likes on 2,501 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RHPAW
Evos had issues with the INS cam bearing and base gaskets.
And lifters that need be replaced more often than a TC, leaky/weepy 3 piece rocker boxes, porous cases, cracked cases, cylinder studs pulling out, cracked inner primaries on bikes that make real power because the trans and motor aren't married together......

Don't get me wrong, Twin Cams surely have their problems too. But when it comes to older HD engine designs, the romance makes people forget a lot.
 

Last edited by Campy Roadie; 09-22-2018 at 04:49 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by Campy Roadie:
Greezey Rider (09-22-2018), nevada72 (09-22-2018), perki48 (10-10-2018)
  #10  
Old 09-22-2018, 05:18 AM
badcooky's Avatar
badcooky
badcooky is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Location location.
Posts: 3,097
Received 473 Likes on 370 Posts
Default

The TC is a POS the MOCO is hoping to forget.
Go to your local HD on Monday morning, have a look in there'll be mostly the TC POS in there being worked on because they have exploded the timing chest or scissored the crank or any of the over 30 recalls for the bucket of schit.
The Evo is a classic and has style and charisma the TC is just a POS.
 

Last edited by badcooky; 09-22-2018 at 05:20 AM.
The following users liked this post:
tar_snake (09-22-2018)


Quick Reply: Reliability/longevity of EVO vs. early Twin Cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 AM.