Are the cam chain tensioners still an issue after the 2008 models?
#1
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Behind you, making faces
Posts: 4,647
Received 5,228 Likes
on
1,858 Posts
Are the cam chain tensioners still an issue after the 2008 models?
I know that Harley switched over to the hydraulic tensioners sometime in 2007, and these supposedly don't have the danger of disintegrating like the earlier spring-loaded types. Truth be told, I avoided the entire Twin Cam era for this reason.
But is there still anything to be concerned about on a Twin Cam made in 2008 or later?
But is there still anything to be concerned about on a Twin Cam made in 2008 or later?
#2
The following users liked this post:
1 2 many (06-02-2019)
#3
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Behind you, making faces
Posts: 4,647
Received 5,228 Likes
on
1,858 Posts
#4
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Behind you, making faces
Posts: 4,647
Received 5,228 Likes
on
1,858 Posts
Okay, let's back up a bit..... I have a 1994 Fatboy, which of course is an Evo. The cam tensioner isn't an issue here at all because I don't have one.
But I have an interest in moving up to a newer model year. Specifically, there's a 2012 Fatboy that has my interest. I like the idea of going from 80 cubic inches to 103, having a 6th gear, a fat rear tire, and more parts and accessories available.
The only concern is the reason I avoided the Twin Cams in the first place; the cam tensioner issue. But if Harley did away with the spring-operated tensioners and made the hydraulic system standard starting around 2007, did that really and truly take care of the problem or do the tensioner shoes still pose a risk of disintegrating?
But I have an interest in moving up to a newer model year. Specifically, there's a 2012 Fatboy that has my interest. I like the idea of going from 80 cubic inches to 103, having a 6th gear, a fat rear tire, and more parts and accessories available.
The only concern is the reason I avoided the Twin Cams in the first place; the cam tensioner issue. But if Harley did away with the spring-operated tensioners and made the hydraulic system standard starting around 2007, did that really and truly take care of the problem or do the tensioner shoes still pose a risk of disintegrating?
Last edited by Windseeker; 06-01-2019 at 01:17 AM.
The following users liked this post:
HDman13 (06-05-2019)
#9
Okay, let's back up a bit..... I have a 1994 Fatboy, which of course is an Evo. The cam tensioner isn't an issue here at all because I don't have one.
But I have an interest in moving up to a newer model year. Specifically, there's a 2012 Fatboy that has my interest. I like the idea of going from 80 cubic inches to 103, having a 6th gear, a fat rear tire, and more parts and accessories available.
The only concern is the reason I avoided the Twin Cams in the first place; the cam tensioner issue. But if Harley did away with the spring-operated tensioners and made the hydraulic system standard starting around 2007, did that really and truly take care of the problem or do the tensioner shoes still pose a risk of disintegrating?
But I have an interest in moving up to a newer model year. Specifically, there's a 2012 Fatboy that has my interest. I like the idea of going from 80 cubic inches to 103, having a 6th gear, a fat rear tire, and more parts and accessories available.
The only concern is the reason I avoided the Twin Cams in the first place; the cam tensioner issue. But if Harley did away with the spring-operated tensioners and made the hydraulic system standard starting around 2007, did that really and truly take care of the problem or do the tensioner shoes still pose a risk of disintegrating?
Hydraulic are much more reliable but should still be checked.
I don’t know anyone personally that has had failure on the 07 up twin cam. Don’t trip on all the horror stories, a well maintained 96 or 103 will take care of you for many miles.
Only thing that I’m moderately concerned about is twisting a crank if I build too much of a top end.... With that said guys are running 120 TQ/HP on stock cranks without twisting them.
2012 Fatboy is a nice ride! 1994 Fatboy ain’t too bad either.
The following 2 users liked this post by 23Seven:
nytryder (06-03-2019),
Windseeker (06-01-2019)
#10