General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Buell vs. Vrod

  #11  
Old 03-27-2012, 03:29 PM
Nirvana's Avatar
Nirvana
Nirvana is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 710
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lh4x4
My 08 Buell Ulysses with the 1203 cc converted Sportster motor will match my 12 Night Rod Special in the 1/4 and almost top end.

The 106HP Buell is about 100 lbs lighter than the 125HP Night Rod and more low end torque for off the line. A group in Sweden had a U tube video of a Ulysses with studded tires on a frozen lake going 137 mph on radar. It probably would do better on pavement. The Night Rod is about 10 mph faster.

Anyone who has never ridden the air cooled Buell would be surprised at it's over all performance. Eric had the power curve and gearing spot on through the rpm range. Of any of the bikes that I have had none are as matched with the gearing and power output that the Buell is. HD XL 1200 is 65 HP at the crank stock. The Buell version is 106HP at the crank stock. The HD XR1200 which HD robbed the Buell parts bin only put out 90HP stock as HD did not engineer the air inflow as well as Buell did.
I've been admiring the Buell Ulysses for some time now. It is amazing what a Sportster engine is capable of. Oh, and it's still air/oil-cooled AND it has a catalytic converter!! Some people on this forum are so full of ****.

By the way I think it's only 103hp, not 106. Anyway, it's a shame HD shut down Buell production.
 
  #12  
Old 03-27-2012, 10:17 PM
95th 1200's Avatar
95th 1200
95th 1200 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Waukesha, WI
Posts: 1,045
Received 102 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

The 1125R goes like a raped ape, it's engineered to handle and go fast. From those I've talked to it pulls from midrange all the way to top end.
 
  #13  
Old 03-28-2012, 03:13 PM
lh4x4's Avatar
lh4x4
lh4x4 is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 13,402
Received 929 Likes on 571 Posts
Default

Nirvana - You're right 103HP. I was going from memory and at 71 yoa that does work as well anymore among other things.
 
  #14  
Old 03-28-2012, 03:18 PM
jwhardin's Avatar
jwhardin
jwhardin is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: flyover country
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cowpokey
I bet this one will outrun a Vrod.


easily.

but who wants to go fast??
 
  #15  
Old 03-28-2012, 04:11 PM
Village Idiot™'s Avatar
Village Idiot™
Village Idiot™ is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,152
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jwhardin
easily.

but who wants to go fast??
I could ask, "who wants to putt around?"

Some people like to go for a Sunday ride 10 mph under the speed limit with no concerns about holding up anyone behind them and others like the adrenaline rush of being able to do 160 mph and lean over far enough to have one knee skin the pavement while feeling the pull of gravity in the turns.
 
  #16  
Old 03-28-2012, 04:59 PM
fat_tony's Avatar
fat_tony
fat_tony is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Potsdam, NY
Posts: 5,865
Received 168 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by texasjon
maybe its dumb but what bike is faster topend and 1/4 mile?
The same VROD motors where used in both bikes. Buell also used a few of the air cooled HD engines.

In all cases though Buell re-tuned the engines through different fuel induction and valve timing to produce more HP at the expense of slightly less torque low in the rev range.

Buells were also comparatively lightweight bikes with stressed aluminum frames and weight restrictive designs. More HP + 100-200lbs less weight means faster acceleration.
 
  #17  
Old 03-28-2012, 05:09 PM
fat_tony's Avatar
fat_tony
fat_tony is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Potsdam, NY
Posts: 5,865
Received 168 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nirvana
I've been admiring the Buell Ulysses for some time now. It is amazing what a Sportster engine is capable of. Oh, and it's still air/oil-cooled AND it has a catalytic converter!! Some people on this forum are so full of ****.

By the way I think it's only 103hp, not 106. Anyway, it's a shame HD shut down Buell production.
The Ulysses is a nice looking bike but if you compare it to bikes in the same adventure touring category selling at similar prices like say BMW (GS), Triumph (Tiger), Yamaha (Tenere), Ducatti (MultiStrada), the Ulysses was not a stand out. Buells sold in a very competitive market niche dominated by technology, an area where they could not stay competitive with their reliance on HD power plants.
 
  #18  
Old 03-29-2012, 11:45 AM
Village Idiot™'s Avatar
Village Idiot™
Village Idiot™ is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,152
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fat_tony
The same VROD motors where used in both bikes. Buell also used a few of the air cooled HD engines.

In all cases though Buell re-tuned the engines through different fuel induction and valve timing to produce more HP at the expense of slightly less torque low in the rev range.

Buells were also comparatively lightweight bikes with stressed aluminum frames and weight restrictive designs. More HP + 100-200lbs less weight means faster acceleration.
In what reality did this happen? Buells never had a Vrod motor in them and used a sportster based engine until the Rotax engine was introduced in the 1125r. In fact, until the 1125r, the VRod has always made more power than the Buell.
 
  #19  
Old 03-29-2012, 02:55 PM
crush63's Avatar
crush63
crush63 is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 134
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robotech
Might want to find out what bikes the OP is talking about...in NHRA drag racing both V-rods and Buells are present...and the V-rods tend to win more often than not. Qualifying results from the Gator Nationals two weeks ago:

Psn Rider Vehicle ET Speed
1. Hector Arana Lucas Oil Buell 6.777$ 196.10
2. Eddie Krawiec Screamin' Eagle/Vance & Hines 6.788 199.26^
3. Andrew Hines Screamin' Eagle/Vance & Hines 6.826 198.73
4. Karen Stoffer Geico Suzuki 6.833 198.00
5. Matt Smith Al-Anabi Racing Buell 6.872 194.32
6. LE Tonglet Nitrofish Suzuki 6.880 196.27
7. Gerald Savoie SAF & Motorcycles Specalities 6.886 193.68
8. Shawn Gann Gann Speed Buell 6.895 189.95
9. David Hope VRoom Racing Buell 6.900 194.07
10. Mike Berry Varoom/ LAT Racing Oil Buell 6.910 192.33
11. Jim Underdahl Suzuki Extended Protection Suz 6.918 196.87
12. Angie Smith Coffman Tank Trucks Buell 6.926 190.59
13. Michael Ray GottSpeed/Star Racing Buell 6.933 187.52
14. Steve Johnson Steve Johnson Racing Suzuki 6.940 194.66
15. Katie Sullivan Sullivan Family Racing Suzuki 6.990 191.97
16. Joe DeSantis Team Joey D Suzuki 7.014 190.97

Final round:

(W) Eddie Krawiec (Screamin' Eagle/Vance & Hine 0.053 6.847 197.08
(L) Karen Stoffer (Geico Suzuki) -0.002(R) 6.949 193.27

So you had one Buell then the only two V-Rods in the whole competition qualify 1, 2, 3. And all a lot faster than 10 seconds.

And if you want to just talk "factory" bikes...then look at the VRXSE Screamin' Eagle Destroyer. That is also under 10 seconds. Granted not a street bike but the OP didn't specify that.

To which I say, OP...just what exactly are you looking for? I'm assuming you're talking for street use. The V-rod is more of a "power cruiser" while the hot Buells are classic Sportbike all the way. Generally, the V-Rod will be more comfortable (note I said "more"...meaning "relative to") than your standard Sportbike seating position but will less capable in the turns and, depending on which Buell you're talking about, slower in straight line acceleration.
The V-Rods and Buells running in NHRA Pro Stock Motorcycle share zero parts in common with any production V-Rod or Buell motorcycles. The Vance and Hines V-Rod's run a 160CI 4-valve per head pushrod engine that V&H designed in-house. The Buell's all run 160C1 S&S engines (4-valve per head, pushrod) designed specificly for NHRA competition. The S&S engines are loosely based on the evo sportster engine.

Two years ago I owned both a 97 Buell s1 Lightning (1200cc evo) and a 08 Night Rod Special. The V-rod made more power but the Buell was 225lbs lighter. The V-rod was quicker but only because the Buell was nearly imposible to launch cleanly from a dead stop. With wheele bars installed the Buell would have bested the v-rod in the 1/4 no problem.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DavidStiebel
General Harley Davidson Chat
47
09-25-2020 10:19 AM
bgbjr2
VRSC Models
2
11-05-2019 06:02 PM
SteveO-ll
Want To Buy Motorcycles/Parts/Accessories
0
04-17-2012 10:05 PM
Slim_B_Kool
VRSC Models
0
04-15-2011 10:30 PM
lanny
General Harley Davidson Chat
0
06-15-2008 07:11 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Buell vs. Vrod



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.