Are they any old post or I info on how the 222 cams would work vs andrews 21 in a 96 inch moter?

 

Don't know BUT the Andrews 48 kicks *** in a 96!

 

Your question is open to too many variables regarding the engine build and the riding you would be doing, as well as what type of bike. With a 96", I would go with the Andrews 26 series if only punching up the cubic inches.

Good luck.

 

Bikes a 09 dyna with a stock 96 looking for low end.. Looking at the woods 222 or andrews 21

 

Not sure bout the woods 222 heard woods makes a great gear driven cam, but I had the Andrews 21 h installed on my 2010 FB , best investment I made . Really woke up that 96 motor all low end Pulls like a train all the way thru... No regrets , these cams worked for me, bike pulls.

 

I was thinking the 888's for the 96?

 

Thanks guys

 

There's not much info on the 21 in a 96 inch moter

 

I ran 21g's for 40K miles or so, I started out at 88" and built to 95" along the line. They worked out well for me with the exception of being a little finicky about fuel quality and a few hard starts. If I had it to do over I'd have picked the 26, very close on performance, easier starts, and reportedly better fuel mileage than the 21. I'm fixin' to put a set of 222 Woods in my 103. I was a bit spooked by the early close of the 48's even though everyone says they are great.

 

The reason for that is the 21 is aimed at the 88ci motor. Andrews similar cam aimed at the 96ci is the 48. The 48 is basically a 21 updated for the 96.