FP3 autotune vs. preloaded map
#1
FP3 autotune vs. preloaded map
first, spare me the FP3 hate...I'm sure a majority of you guys scoff at it as a entry level tuner, being that were here in the tuning section, but I got it for free and I had great luck with it on my past bike.
I'm curious how effective running the autotune is vs. just one of the maps on there already, is?
I'm running a Bassani 2-into-1 road rage on my FXDLS and since it only has V&H and few other exhausts, I'm running a different system, but it doubt it makes that big of a difference.
is the autotune that effective or is what I'm running now (hi-output 2-into-1 short) the way to go?
I'm curious how effective running the autotune is vs. just one of the maps on there already, is?
I'm running a Bassani 2-into-1 road rage on my FXDLS and since it only has V&H and few other exhausts, I'm running a different system, but it doubt it makes that big of a difference.
is the autotune that effective or is what I'm running now (hi-output 2-into-1 short) the way to go?
#2
#4
#5
No starter map is going to be perfect. The trims might bring it in. Some areas are going to be rich and some lean. About 18% adjustment is what it will allow. Doing a couple of auto tunes is going to zero out the trims, and also give you good data for carrying out and blending those cells that you can't get.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
That will be run two tanks of petrol through ...so that the ECU has time to "learn and trim" itself ...maybe!! ...rather than running autotune to centre the VE tables properly and then let the trims keep it on target as the weather, altitude, and a dodgy fill of fuel from time to time changes things up n down n back n forth.
Last edited by Gordon61; 02-01-2018 at 11:06 AM.
#10